290 THE ENTOMOLOGIST. 
follows—U pperside: Fore wing—red ground-colour deeper than usual.,. 
black terminal border very broad. Blue lunules almost obsolete, only 
represented by three diffuse patches of blue scales in centre of border. 
Yellow spots along costa absent, first from base being red, and second, 
strongly suffused with black. White spot near apex less well defined 
and larger than usual and slightly suffused with black. Hind wing— 
usual yellow and red band from anal angle to costa represented by a 
deeper red oval patch traversed by black veins and not reaching: 
vein 6. Underside fore wing—terminal border of dark striz much 
broader than usual, usual grey-blue lunules absent. Hind wing— 
basal half black, outer half dark fuscous. Grey-blue lunules in, 
terminal band present but smaller than usual, and not joined 
together. It was very distinct even in flight. Czdaria ommanata, 
a form seen on 15th and captured on 18th is as follows : Ground-colour 
white. Central band and basal patch black. Usual dark markings. 
beyond central band reduced in size. Hind wingsnormal. Itseems 
to be referable to ab. thingvallata, Staud. It has a strong superficial 
resemblance to the black-banded form of Lampropteryx suffwmata.— 
G. H. BE. Hopkins; Shevington Vicarage, near Wigan. 
Ca@NONYMPHA PAMPHILUs, vVAR.— Whilst collecting near Padstow, 
N. Cornwall, in August, 1919, I took a variety of this insect similar to 
the second variety mentioned by Mr. Augustus E. Stafford (‘ Entom..,’ 
October, 1921, p. 242), namely with four dark spots along the outer area 
of the hind wing above. I have been unable to trace records of other 
similar varieties. —KENNETH J. Haywarp, F.E.S.; Reservoir, Aswan, 
Egypt, October 14th, 1921. 
Ca@NONYMPHA PAMPHILUS, VARS.—With reference to the note on 
C. pamphilus, vars. (p. 242), by Mr. A. EH. Stafford, I should like to 
reply to his question that on looking through my fairly long series of 
this butterfly from various localities, I fail to find any with ‘blind 
eye-spot at anal angle of hind wings,” but several with ‘‘ spots or 
points along the outer area.”” In those from Amasia and Broussa, in 
Asia Minor, only faintly indicated whereas in 2 ? 2 ,one from Palermo, 
Sicily, and the other from Ain Zahalta, in the Lebanon, these spots. 
are very distinct, and in the case of the latter, from Ain Zahalta, two. 
on each wing are pupilled minutely with white-—M. E. Founraing, 
F.E.S. ; 126, Lexham Gardens, London, W. 8. 
Puesetius (LycaiNA) ARGUS = GON ; SEcoNnD Broop.—On October 
30th I took one newly emerged male specimen of the above species 
in the New Forest between Lyndhurst Road and Beaulieu Road. 
Prolonged search by myself and an entomological friend failed to 
yield further specimens. Tutt says (‘Brit. Lepid.,’ vol. x, p. 227) 
‘‘in Britain the species is entirely single-brooded,” and gives no date 
of specimens captured later than September 19th in the year 1877 
(loc. cit., p. 230). The species was flying in the greatest profusion 
in the New Forest on June 25th of this year.—Wm. FassniIpGE; 47, 
Tennyson Road, Southampton. 
Notes oN CYANIRIS ARGIOLUS.—With reference to the Rev. G. H. 
Raynor’s note in the ‘ Entomologist’ for September I have to-day, 
October 16th, seen in my garden a specimen of Cyamris argiolus, 
