224 THE ENTOMOLOGIST. 



The above differences are practically all the distinctive 

 characters between these sports, the form of the transverse 

 lines being variable. 



EpTdromia, Guen. 

 Ejndromia imnnosa. 

 Eindromia pannosa, Guence, Noct. 3, p. 326, n. 1791 (1852). 

 Remigia satiiratior, Walker, Lep. Het. xiv. p. 1502, n. 12 



(1857). 

 Brazil. In Coll. B. M. 



Eimlro m ia valkla . 

 Ophisma valida, Walker, Lep. Het. Suppl. 3, p. 953 (18G5). 

 St. Doraingo. In Coll. B. M. 



E2Jidromia zetophora. 

 Ejvdromia zetopJwra, Guenee, Noct. 3, ]3. 326, n. 1792, pi. 23, 



fig. 5 (1852). 

 Ophisma ? antica, Walker, Lep. Het. Snppl. 3, p. 954 (1865). 

 Venezuela. In Coll. B. M. 



M. Guenee's figure of this species is very bad ; more like a 

 Thermesia than an Epidromia in form. 



Orthogramma, Guen. 

 Orthogramma coppeyi. 

 $ Ortlioqramma coppeyi, Guenee, Noct. 3, p. 348, n. 1816 



(1852). 

 Epitausa latabilis, Walker, Lep. Het. x. p. 477, n. 1 (1856). 

 ? Thermesia ? icterodes, Felder, Eeise der Nov. Lep. 4, 



pi. cxviii. fig. 7. 

 St. Domingo. In Coll. B. M. 



Ortliogramina guttidaris. 

 $ Thermesia guttidaris, Walker, Lep. Het. Suppl. 3, p. 1049 



(1865). 

 Azeta apicifera, Walker, I. c, p. 1065 (1865). 

 $ Archana certa, Walker, I.e., p. 1098 (1865). 

 Ega, Santarem, Para, Espiritu Sancto. In Coll. B. M. 



Argidia, Guen. 

 Argidia tomyris. 

 PJialcena tomyris, Cramer, Pap Exot. 3, p. 123, pi. 262, r, G 



(1782). 

 Argidia hyperythra, Guenee, Noct. 3, p. 346, n. 1818 (1852). 

 Surinam and Cayenne. 



There cannot be a question about the identity of these 

 supposed species ; even Guenee is obliged to admit that his 



