192 ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDA. 
CarenumM Scaritomwes, W. Nigrum nitidum subangustum, elytris violaceo tenuis- 
sime marginatis, punctis duobus humeralibus alterisque duobus subapicalibus, 
pronoto linea tenui centrali impresso, tibiis anticis externe bidentatis. Long. corp. 
lin. 93 (mens. angl.). Lat. elytr. feré lin. 3. Habitat Port Philip, West 
Australia. In Mus. D. Hope. 
Page 91, Plate XXIV. 
Page 93, Entomol. Intell., (No. VI.). 
Page 103, Schizorhina obliquata is synonymous with the subsequently published Diaphonia 
eucnemis of Burmeister. 
Page 104, Macronota Rafflesiana = Teniodera histrio, Burm. 
Macronota tristis is probably the female of Chalcothea Barrotiana, Burm. 
Macronota Vittigera, Hope, is described by Burmeister as the variety a of 
Clerota Budda. F 
Page 118, Rhomborhina opalina. Some of the specimens of this species received by Captain 
Parry from India differ in the colour of the scutellum, and have been considered 
by that gentleman as distinct, under the name of Rh. intermedia. 
—— Rhomborhina Japonica. Dr. Burmeister (p. 779) considers this species as identical 
with Rh. opalina, in which, however, he is certainly mistaken, since the two 
insects are structurally distinct. His strictures on the breadth of my figure of 
Rh. Japonica and the width of its feet, are contradicted by my short description 
of that species derived from Mr. Hope’s typical specimen. The sternal process 
of Rh. Japonica is scarcely more than half of that of Rh. opalina. 
Page 119, Dr. Burmeister considers Rhomborhina microcephala (the specific name of which 
he has unnecessarily altered to An. Mearesii) as well as Heterorhina gla- 
berrima, as belonging to the genus Anomalocera, which does not accord with 
my views of the relations of these insects. 
Rhomborhina clypeata. (Plate 34, fig. 3). 
Page 120, Rhomborhina pilipes. Melly’s MSS. (Burm., p. 779.) Mr. Melly having 
been so good as to send me the unique specimen in his collection thus named, I 
find it agrees with the insect named by Mr. Hope Rh. distincta, and which, as 
stated in p. 118, appears to me only a variety of Rh. Mellii, agreeing therewith 
in antenne, sternal process, metasternal carina, black extremity of abdomen, 
black hairs on the tibia, form of clypeus, &c. Dr. Burmeister (p. 780) bas 
incorrectly considered Fh. apicalis as a variety of Rh. pilipes. 
—— Mr. Hope has recently received a very distinct species of Rhomborhina from 
India, allied to, but larger than, Rk. Mellii. 
Page 122, Trigonophorus Delessertii. (Plate 29, fig. 4). 
—— Mr. Hope has recently received another species of T'rigonophorus from India, 
allied to Tr. Saundersii. 
Page 126, line 6 and 7, for ‘‘ Plesiorrhina,’’ read Bothrorrhina, 
—— Note *, Anisorrhina is synonymous with the subsequently published genus 
Genyodonta, Burm. 
Page 127, Schizorhina Guerinii belongs to the genus Stenotarsia, Burm., and is allied to 
St. coccinea. 
Schizorhina plumigera is the Pogonotarsus plumiger, Burm. 
Page 128, Chromoptilia diversipes is identical with the subsequently published T'richo- 
tarsia fimbriata, Burm., p. 587. 
Page 134, Heterorhina dives is the Mystroceros or Diceros Diardi, Burm. 
Page 136, Heterorhina tibialis. Dr. Burmeister (p. 787 and 789) thinks that this very 
distinct species is a-variety of H. Hopei. My figures of the armature of the 
clypeus and sternal process of the two species will sufficiently prove their dis- 
tinction. 
Page 157, Heterorhina jucunda (smaragdina, Gory and Perchéron), judging from Mr. 
Hope’s typical specimen, is certainly quite a different species from H. punc- 
tatissima, although Dr. Burmeister considers the contrary to be the case (p. 788). 
—— Dr. Burmeister having commented upon my figures of the maxille of the various 
species of this genus, I will only observe that they were all made with the 
express desire of determining the form of that organ, and that if the specimens 
examined by Dr. Burmeister do not precisely agree with my figures, I am of 
opinion that it has resulted from the specimens varying in this respect from each 
other. 
Page 153, Papilio Trophonius, as stated to me by Mr. E. Doubleday, is identical with the 
Danais Rechila of Godart. Enc. Méth. 
Page 173. line 14, add “ pronoto” after “ clypeo porresto.’’ 
