TELLINA. 33 
Gellina Gargadta. 
Our author did not himself possess this species, which, from 
the description in the ‘ Museum Ulrice,’ has been universally 
recognised (Tellina Gargadia, Hanley in Sow. 'Thesaur. Conch. 
vol. i. pl. 62, f. 181). The erroneous references correct them- 
selves, there being no N in plate 43 of Rumphius (it should 
have been 42, Remies Gargadica), whilst fig. 55 (a mere copy 
from the last) is only present in plate 10 of Klein’s bivalves. 
Tellina linguactelts. 
The Tellina lingua-feis (Hanley in Sow. Thesaur. Conch. 
vol. i. pl. 64, f. 286) still remains in the Linnean cabinet, and 
alone agrees with the description in the ‘ Museum Ulrice.’ The 
name was taken from Rumphius, whose figure is copied by 
Klein. Gualtier’s delineation (pl. 76, f. B) is scarcely correct, 
if intended for this species. 
Tellina bivgata. 
An example of the Tellina virgata (Sow. Thesaur. Conch. 
vol. i. pl. 63, f. 204) is marked for this species in the Linnean 
collection. The erroneous reference to Argenville is expunged 
in the revised copy of the ‘ Systema.’ 
Tellina angulata. 
Had Chemnitz carefully studied the description in the ‘ Sys- 
tema, he would scarcely have selected a smooth species of 
Tellen for his T’.. angulata. He has, however, been followed by 
most writers (Schréter, Wood, Dillwyn, &c.), who have alike 
disregarded the expressions “ Affinis T’. virgate” and “ striis 
tramsversis recurvatis.” The meaning of the last term is thus 
= 
