I 



193 



The following entries appear in the registers of St. Peter's :— 



1688. May 13, baptized Richard, son of Thomas Mathews, and Alice, his wife. 



1690. Jany 18, baptized Henry, Sunn of Thomas IMathews, and Alice, his wife. 



1691. Jany 19, baptized Edmond, son of Thomas Mathews, and Alice, his wife. 

 Feby 12, buried Edmond Mathews. 



1692. ffeb 14, baptized Hannah, daughter of Thomas Mathews, and Alice, 

 his wife. 



1697. Jan 19, baptized Robert, son of Thomas Mathewes, and Alice, his 

 wife. 



Thomas Mathewes signed the Registers of St. Peter's in 1681, as church- 

 warden. 



In St. Owen's Register. 



1681. September 18. Baptized Susanna, the daughter of Thomas Matthews, 

 and Alice, bis wife. 



23. O. ROGER MORGAN =■ A fleur de lis. 



K. IN HERE FORD = E. M In four lines. (Octagonal.) (Plate 1, No. 6.) k 



The following appears in St. Peter's Register :— 



1685. Ap the 21, married Roger Morgan, of this parish, and Eleanor Skipp, 

 of the parish of St. John Bap. 



R. Morgan signed the Register of St. Peters in 1680, as churchwarden. 



24. 0. lOHN MOSS = a fleece. 



R. OP HEERIFOUD =: I . I . M i 



A Jno Morse was assessed for four fire hearths in Wyebridge Ward. 16 and 

 17 Chas. II. 



It is doubtful whether the following entries in the Registers of All Saints' re- 

 fer to this issuer or not, as besides the difference in spelling of the surname, the 

 wife's initial on the token is I. 



1G84. Edward, the Sone of Mr. John Morse and Elizabeth, his wife, was 

 baptized the 26th of October. 



1687. Margaret, ye daughter of Mr. John Morse and Elizabeth, his wife, was 

 baptized 12 Junii. 



25. O. THOMAS POWELL = Seven stars 



R. IN HEREFORD . 1669 = HIS . HALF PENT i 



The issuer of this token was probably an innkeeper. The sign of the " Seven 

 Stars " stiU exists in the city. 



26. 0. HVGH . RODD . HIS . HALFE . PENNY = Arms of the City. 



R. IN . HEREFORD =: An Elephant with Castle on its back. i 



Boyne describes a token. No. 12 in his list, " hvgh low.," which is no doubt 

 intended for the above, as it corresponds in all respects besides the name, which is 

 one that does not occur in any records of the period. 



