138 MR. G. A. BOULENGER ON THE 
Among his specimens from Médling, Baden, Véslau, Reichenau, and Miesenbach, not 
one is without at least an indication of it, whilst he could not find such a thing in any 
of his Wall-Lizards from various other parts of Europe. 
Dr. Werner has been so kind as to send me living specimens from Baden and 
Voslau, particulars of which are given in the following tabulation, along with the 
specimens preserved in his private collection (W.) which he has allowed me to 
examine. 
il 2. 3. 4 5. 6. 7 
Baden es 6 che: omefeeeee, COOn ambos 9 22 15 2¢ 
W. y Ss es ee Sy SY Re ee) 9. 24 17 23 
. «eS Lo oS OO MeO O! eed OS G21 eel 5G moo 
- Be a le ee Ge ORE OES O Sy 19 16 23 
Wich 6 Go 56 6 «o gf EO SO BA 9 23 19-18 24 
eee Sr ebS) AG) 20" “On o2t) 1G. eH 
a“ Jira Meibee ob ROG Tih ese ROO duo Obemne 9 23 18-16 22 
a Se BGS ery tay elo rE 9 26 16 Ps) 
We Modlincs 25) aie tl een oe OmmEan moO 8 23 19-16 24 
Wow Beichenanic evr, cu ceucinns ea OAL ao el Omar: 16 22 
Wi Pernitz <<. cc . balcneta gy mOOMEEAON soa. Oem k 18 24 
Wee Mitesentbach) 20 cn OOM moe 8 26 18 24 
1. Length (in millimetres) from snout to vent. 2. Number of scales across middle of body. 
3. Transverse series of ventral plates. 4. Number of plates in collar. 5. Number of scales and 
granules between symphysis of chin-shields and median collar-plate. 6. Number of femoral pores 
(on right and left sides, if differing). 7. Number of lamellar scales under the fourth toe.— 
The same notation is followed throughout in this paper. 
The division of the parietal is complete on both sides in 3 specimens, complete on 
one side and incomplete on the other in 6, incomplete in the rest. The anterior 
supraocular is absent in the specimen from Reichenau. One of the specimens from 
Voéslau has two postnasals, and in another from the same locality (Pl. XVI. fig. 4) 
the parietal does not touch the upper postocular *. One of the specimens from Baden 
has only three anterior upper labials. In all of them the second supraocular is in 
contact with the supraciliaries. 
* Jn my previous contribution I have carefully recorded such exceptions to the rule on account of 
Prof. Mchely’s statement (Ann. Mus. Hung. ii. 1904, p. 368, footnote), “Ich habe z. B. viele hunderte von 
sehr verschiedenen Fundorten herstammende Uxemplare der Lacerta muralis, L. vivipara und L. taurica 
untersucht und niemals ein Exemplar angetroffen, bei dem das erste Postoculare [upper postocular] nicht an 
das Parietale angestossen hatte.” Now, it is very remarkable that when I examine scores instead of 
hundreds of specimens of the typical form, I come upon such exceptional specimens. I have previously 
mentioned six from France (Tr. 1905, p. 354), I now add one from Austria, and further on I record 
another from France and 23 from Spain, which makes 31 exceptions out of about 260 specimens, or 
12 per cent, 

