44 



in hb. Tr.) Crescere desistit, — orientem versus prope oppidum 

 Orenburg (Claus), ad 11. Ilek (Bunge), prope Nartsana (hb. H. 

 Petr.) et Tiflis (Radde in hb. Tr.), — austrum versus autem in 

 Anatolia (Boiss.)etArmenia turcica (Boiss.) nee non rossica (Radde 

 in hb. Tr.) cessat. 



81. (:^3). Lathyrüs cyaneüs C. Koch in Linnaea XY. p. 723. 



var. sessilifolia Trautv.— Orohus sessilifolius Sibth. et 

 Sm. — Ledeb. Fl. ross. I. p. 693. — Orohus digi- 

 tatusM. Bieb. Fl. taur. cauc. fl, p. 153, IH. p. 463. — 

 Orobus pyrenaicus Habl. Phys. Beschr. der Taur. 

 Statth. p. 209? (sec. M. Bieb.), 

 var. petiolata Trautv. — Orohus cyaneus Stev. — Le- 

 deb. Fl. ross. I. p. 693. — Orohus Buxb. Cent. ü. 

 p. 36. tab. 38. — Orohi canescentis var. digitata 

 Alef. in Bonpland. IX. p. 142. 

 Septentrionem versus Odessam (hb. H. Petr.), Tauriam (hb. 

 Tr.), fortalitium Anapa (Lagowski in hb. Tr.), pag. Kislowodsk 

 gub. Stawropol (hb. H. Petr.) et pagum Kryss Daghestaniae au- 

 stralis (Becker in hb. Tr.) attingit, austrum versus autem ultra 

 fines Transcaucasiae procedit. 



Alefeld speciem hanc cum LatJi. ])allescente C. Koch con- 

 junxit, sed styli forma in hoc omnino alia atque in illa, uti jam 

 Boissier in Flora orientali sua recte monuit, nempe Lath. pal- 

 lescensQ. Koch stylo apicem versus spathulato-dilatato, Lath. 

 cijaneus C. Koch autem stylo lineari vel subcuneato-lineari, id 

 est apicem versus sensim paullum dilatato, gaudet. 



Species dubiae. 



Lathyrüs mutahilis^md. Brit. Flow. Gard. ü. tab. 194. — 

 Walp. Repert. L p. 720. — Orohus mutahilis Alef. in Bon- 



