viii Proceedings. 
the classification of certain beds with Upper Middle or Lower 
Bagshot, a discussion which 1 always avoid when I can, as 
now, especially as the district is to a great extent not in Surrey. 
Those who wish for more of it should refer also to the “‘ Rejoinder,”’ 
by Dr. A. Invine.* I am glad to find that W. H. Huptxsron has 
come to much the same conclusion as that which I have in- 
dependently reached: ‘It might, indeed, simplify the problem 
if we abolished the so-called Middle and Upper Bagshots [meaning 
the names, not the deposits, which, unfortunately, are beyond . 
our power], and replaced those names by those of the richly 
fossiliferous Hampshire equivalents.”’ t 
Prof. G. 8. Bouncer gave an account of an “‘ Excursion to 
Wotton and Ranmer,’’{ noting a junction-section of Gault and 
Folkestone Beds, and other sections of Lower Greensand. 
In ‘The Hybodont and Cestraciont Sharks of the Cretaceous 
Period,’ § A. 8. Wovopwarp figures specimens from the Lower 
Chalk of Guildford and of Warlingham: the latter perhaps 
should have been noted as Middle Chalk (pl. 2). 
_ J. W. Grover, in “An Explanation of the London Water 
Question,”’ || advocates the taking of a large amount of spring 
water from the Basin of the Mole, near Leatherhead (pp. 214, 
215). ‘ 
F. Lasxam, in “ Paleolithic Man in West Surrey,’ records 
the finding of a good flint implement at Worplesdon, in ‘‘ ballast” 
said to have come from Farnham. — This led to a search in the 
latter neighbourhood, which has resulted in the finding of more 
than three hundred specimens. The Farnham gravels are noticed 
and some implements described. 
18938. 
Two papers, by H. W. Monckton ‘‘On the Occurrence of 
Boulders and Pebbles from the Glacial Drift in Gravels south 
of the Thames,” and by O. A. Surussore ‘‘On the Plateau- 
gravel South of Reading,’’** refer to our county, one of the 
districts described in the former being ‘‘ Weybridge, Kingston, 
and Wimbledon,” whilst Chobham Ridges is one of the localities 
alluded to in the latter. 
Mr. Monckton concludes that, though probably ‘rivers flowing 
in the direction of the present Thames and Kennet existed at the 
time when the Glacial Gravel was spread out, the valleys in 
* Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xlviii, pp. 485-487. 
+ Ibid., vol. xlix, Proceedings, p. 101 (Presidential Address). 
+ Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xii, pts. 9, 10, pp. 403-406. 
§ Proc. Yorksh. Geol. Soc., vol. xii, pt. i, pp. 62-68, pls. 1, 2. 
|| Trans. Surveyors’ Inst., vol. xxiv, pt. vil, p. 195. 
{| Coll. Surrey Archeol. Soc., vol. xi, 5 pp., 2 pls. 
** Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xlix, pp. 308-324. 
