— 

By the Rev. T. A. Preston, M.A. 115 

Salix aurita Scirpus fluitans 
S— repens Eriophorum vaginatum 
S— fusca Carex stellulata 
Mprica Gale C—— axillaris 
Epipactis palustris C—— muricata 
Cephalanthera ensifolia C—— vulgaris 
Herminium monorchis C—— stricta 
Ophrys aranifera C— acuta 
O—— muscifera C—— lepidocarpa 
Narcissus biflorus C—— pallescens 
Tulipa sylvestris C—— binervis 
Fritillaria meleagris C—— levigata 
Ornithogalum nutans C—— strigosa 
Muscari racemosum C—— Pseudo-cyperus 
Conyallaria majalis C—— pilulifera 
Polygonatum officinale C—— tomentosa 
— intermedium C—— clandestina 
Narthecium ossifragum C—— vesicaria 
Alisma ranunculoides Agrostis setacea 
Potamogeton pusillus Arundo Epigejos 
\_ rufescens Aira preecox 
Typha latifolia Avena fatua 
T—— angustifolia , A—— strigosa 
Juncus squarrosus Molinia coerulea 
Luzula sylvatica Sclerochloa rigida 
Cyperus longus Festuca sciuroides 
Rhynchospora alba Brachypodiumpinnatum 
Blysmus compressus Lolium‘arvense 
Scirpus glaucus Nardus stricta 
S—— setaceus And almostfall the’Ferns. 
s— multicaulis 
My only fear in publishing this list, long as it is, is that it may 
lead intending contributors to imagine that the above are a// that 
are required. The fact is, that of Erythrea Centrurium alone are 
there representatives from each of tue five divisions. I have merely 
indicated those species of which we have xo representatives at all, 
and which cannot be easily procured near Marlborough, but as will 
be seen from the Table above given, every division is most inade- 
quately represented, and I can only repeat that I shall gladly enter 
into correspondence with anyone who is anxious to help in the work. 
In conclusion and as an encouragement to intending contributors, 
a few of the more interesting points of the collection, as already 
formed, may be mentioned. 
What are called the Batrachian Ranunculi will, I trust, be well 
