106 DECIDUOUS FRUIT INSECTS AND INSECTICIDES. 
uninjured seedlings soon became injured in the same way, yet no 
thrips were observed on these plants. 
ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE. 
Concerning losses in Maryland, Mr. Johnson, in the Entomological 
News,' states that over 125,000 trees were rendered worthless during 
1896 and 1897; and, writing in 1900,? he affirms that the injury 
still continues about as previously reported, causing dwarfed, crooked, 
and unsalable trees, and adds: 
The extent of the damage, however, this year is not so great as last, as the mite did 
not appear until after the young trees had made from 2 to 3 feet of growth, while last 
season the most injury was done when the trees were from 10 inches to 1 foot in height. 
Asa result, a much larger proportion of trees this season are salable. The mites are 
still active and ruining terminals in many places. On the 9th instant I found eggs of 
this species behind injured buds in the cavities occupied. 
Dr. John B. Smith states (loc. cit.) in reference to New Jersey that 
in almost all of the nurseries which he visited during 1899, a large 
percentage of the trees showed this affection, and, as already noted, 
Prof. W. B. Alwood in a letter to Dr. Smith also refers to the 
prevalence of the trouble in Virginia, as noted by him since 1891. 
Concerning the extent of mjury in Virginia Mr. Phillips states 
(lecheity pad2): 
No peach ‘trees had formerly beén grown in the soil where these observations were 
made prior to 1903. In that year a large block of peach was grown on one section of 
the farm, about 400 yards distant from the block under discussion. 
The plants grew very rapidly at this place, and were from 14 to 2 feet high on the 
17th of May, at the time this examination was made. In the 8,500 plants examined 
the injury varied from 10 to 20 per cent, depending upon the local conditions. It 
was much worse in the slight depressions where water stood for a while after heavy 
rains. 
At this time (May 17), however, the injury had just begun to show plainly. Later 
in the season it was found that not more than 20 to 30 per cent of the trees had escaped 
injury in many sections of the field. Less than 20 per cent of the trees were injured in 
some sections which were located mainly at points where the drainage was good. 
A large block of seedling peach, standing about one-half to three-fourths of a mile 
from the budded stock, and just across the fence from the land that grew peach the year 
before, was examined June 22. In the section of seedlings nearest to land that stood 
in peach the previous year (just across the fence) 28 per cent of the plants had been 
attacked at this date. At another point, about 300 feet from the land that was in 
peach thé previous year, but on a slight knoll where the soil was a little drier, only 
14 per cent of the plants were attacked; but in a lower place, about 900 feet distant, 
30 per cent of the plants were injured. 
At this date (June 22) about 80 per cent of the budded peach had been injured by 
this trouble in many sections of the field, a much larger percentage than was injured 
in the seedlings; but as the seedlings were grown and budded on the land the previous 
year, it is but natural to suppose the injury would be worse in the budded stock. 
1 Ent. News, vol. 8, Dec., 1898, p. 225. 2 Ent. News, vol. 10, May, 1900, p. 471. 
