1897.] KEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. 1-33 



Tertiary horizons are more or less like it, such as A. angustilo- 

 bum Heer. Fl. Tert. Helvet. iii. 57, pi. cxvii. fig. 25a; cxviii. 

 figs. 1-9. 



Sapindus apiculatus Vel. 



(Pi. xiii.figs. 1,2.) 



Sapindus apiculatus Velenovsky, Fl. Boehm. Kreidef. 6 [53], 

 pi. vii. [xxii.J figs. 1-8. 



Paliurus integrifolius ITollick (?) 

 (PI. xiv. fig. 10.) 



Paliurus integrifolius Hollick, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, xxi. 

 (1894) 57, pi. 177, figs. 5, 8, 12. 



This specimen is too fragmentary for anything but provisional 

 reference. 



Rhamnus in^quilateralis Lesq. 

 (PI. xiii. fig. 8.) 



Rhamnus inxquilateralis Lesq. Fl. Dak. Gr., 170, pi. xxxvii. 

 figs. 4-7. 



This leaf appears to be identical with smaller specimens of the 

 above species, such as figs. 6, 7, I. c. 



Celastrophyllum Newberryanum Hollick. 



(PI. xiv. fig. 1.) 



Celastrophyllum Newberryanum Hollick, in Newb. Fl. Amboy 

 Clays, 101, pi. xlix. figs. 1-27. 



Sterculia sp. ? 



(PL xiv. figs. 4-7.) 



These fragmentary remains apparently represent portions of 

 leaves belonging to the genus Sterculia, such as S. mucronata 

 Knowlton, in Lesq. Fl. Dak. Gr. 182, pi. xxx. figs. 1-4. If legi- 

 timate to compare with Tertiary species, our fig. 7 would come 

 very close to S. Labrusca Ung. as figured in Flora von Sotzka 

 pi. xxviii. [xlix] figs. 1-11. 



Magnolia Woodbridgensis Hollick. 



(PI. xiv. fig. 8.) 



Magnolia Woodbridgensis Hollick, in Newb. Fl. Amboy Claj's 

 74, pi. xxxvi. fig. 11 ; Ivii. figs. 5-7. 



