360 RYDBERG: NOTES ON ROSACEAE 
same locality, 1906, N. L. Britton 139; same locality, 1900, 
W. N. Clute 228. 
AzorEs: Fayal, 1894, C. S. Brown 77. 
Fragaria Suksdorfii was based on material which I had referred 
previously to F. cuneifolia, but the broadly lanceolate sepals and 
the decidedly villous fruit distinguish it from that species. The 
following specimens belong here: 
WASHINGTON: Falcon Valley, June 2 and 28, 1883, Suksdorf 
486. 
OREGON: Wilkes Expedition 440. 
British CoLumsia: Meyers Creek, May 5, 1905, Spread- 
borough 69948, is referred here with some doubt, as there is no 
fruit. 
Fragaria yukonensis was described from material originally 
determined as F. chiloensis or F. glauca. The type and some other 
specimens were referred to F. chiloensis on account of the thick sub- 
coriaceous leaflets, but the latter lack the fine tomentum mixed 
with the longer hairs on the lower surface, characteristic of those of 
F. chiloensis. F. yukonensis could not be referred to F. glauca 
on account of its thick leaves. In fact it is more closely related 
to the southern F. ovalis which it resembles very closely. It 
differs, however, in the distinctly petiolulate instead of subsessile 
leaflets and in the longer bractlets. Besides, F. yukonensis is not 
known outside of the Yukon Territory, and F. ovalis not north of 
Wyoming. The following specimens belong to the former: 
YUKON TERRITORY: Lake Lebarge, June 19, 1899, Tarleton 
38; Rapid City, Aug. 20, 1899, R. S. Williams; Ranch Creek, 
June 8, 1899, Gorman 1009; Fifty Miles River, 1899, A. L. Bolton. 
Fragaria Grayana Vilmorin was restored to specific rank in the 
North American Flora. It was first described as F. virginiana 
dlinoensis A. Gray, under which name it has been best known. 
It was recognized before Dr. Gray described it, by Price, who 
recorded it as F. illinoensis but gave no description. I have found 
no specimens in the herbaria from any place east of Indiana and 
Alabama, although the type was said to have come from western 
New York. All specimens so named from the eastern states 
belonged to either F. virginiana or F. grandiflora, which latter is 
an escape from cultivation. 
