468 MurrILL: PHILIPPINE POLYPORACEAE 
Coriolus vernicipes (Berk.) Murrill. Polyporus vernicipes Berk. 
Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot. 16:50. 1878. (Type from Japan.) 
Luzon: Mt. Banahao, 650 m., E/mer 7550. 
Cycloporellus* cichoriaceus (Fr.) Murrill. Polyporus intybaceus 
Berk. Lond. Jour. Bot.1:149. 1842. (Type fromthe Philip- 
pines.) Not P. intybaceus Fr.  Polystictus cichoriaceus Fr. 
Nov. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Ups. III. 1:92. 1855. Polyporus 
setiporus Berk. Hook. Lond. Jour. Bot. 6:505. fl. 20. f. 2. 
1847. (Type from Ceylon.) 
Luzon: Upper Lamao, 700 m., Williams; Lamao, Merrill 
3528. 
Cycloporellus microcyclus (Lév.)Murrill. Polyporus microcyclus 
Lév. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. III. 2:188. 1844. (Type from 
Java.) 
Luzon: Lamao, 115 m., Williams; Upper Lamao, 700 m., 
Williams ; Mt. Mariveles, Elmer 6937. Leyte: Palo, 
Elmer 7228. 
Earliella corrugata (Pers.) Murrill. Polyporus corrugatus Pers. ; 
Gaud. Voy. Freyc. Bot. 172. 1826. Polyporus fusco-badius 
Pers.; Gaud. Voy. Freye. Bot. 172. 1826. (Type from the 
Marianne Islands.) Polyporus scabrosus Pers.; Gaud. Voy. 
Freyc. Bot. 172. 1826. (Type from the Marianne Islands.) 
? Polyporus mariannus Pers.; Gaud. Voy. Freyc. Bot.173. 1826. 
(Type from the Marianne Islands.) Daedalea sanguinea Kl. 
Linnaea 8:481. 1833. (Type from the East Indies.) ? 77a- 
metes bicolor Berk. Trans. Linn. Soc. Bot. 16:43. 1878: 
(Type from the island of Aru.) Polystictus Persoonit Cooke, 
Grevillea 14:85. 1886. Trametes nitida Pat. Jour. de Bot. 
4:17. 1890. (Type from Tonkin.) 
Luzon: Mt. Mariveles, Elmer Ogz2r, Oo7s.. Leyte: Palo, 
Elmer 7206, 7208. 
*The genus Cyclomycetella (Bull. Torrey Club 31: 422. 1904), based Of 
Boletus pavonius Hook., becomes a synonym of Coriolus, since the real type of this 
species proves to be a member of the latter genus, rather than synonymous with 
Polyporus iodinus Mont. as generally supposed. I therefore suggest the name Cyclo- 
porellus for this group of species, with Polyporus iodinus Mont. (Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. 
II. 16: 108. 1841) as its type, and with the same diagnosis as that already pub- 
lished for Cyclomycetella. Ae 
