136 
A.D. 1316. (V.) 
Nomina Villarum. P. 70. Vol. 3. Records, 
Hundred of Bath Forinsecum held by Prior of Bath 
in which are the Vills. 
(Modern Name.) (Holder.) 
Kilveston... ..-Kelston ... Abbess of Shafton 
Langerug.... ... Langridge ...Jno. Ley 
& 
with hamlet Catewyk ...Tadwick ...Jno. Hese 
( Weston fe ... Weston ...Prior of Dath 
with hamlets _ 
| North Stok . _ ... Northstoke & 
& 
lasaoeye at ... Woodewick ...Ralph de Paveley 
( Swayneswyk ...Swainswick ...Jno. Hese 
& 
\ with hamlet Ferschford Freshford ...Jno. de Ferschford 
Bathemaston ... Batheaston ..-Prior of Bath 
with hamlets Walcote... Walcot 
Forde — ...Bathford 
Batewyke .. .. Bathwick ... Abbess of Wherwell 
{ with baat Wellelegh.. . Woolley 
Lyncombe ... ... Lyncombe ..-Prior of Bath 
j with apes Combe ...Monkton Combe 
( sai Stok .. southstoke 
Note the omission of Bathampton, Charlcombe, and Claverton. 
(See Table III) 
Table II differs a good deal from Eyton’s Vol. 2, p. 13, one 
reason being the necessity of properly representing modern areas 
as required by Table III, bearing out what has been said already 
about leakage from full area. The two Feschefordas are 
omitted, Domesday sequence claiming them for the two Vexfords 
in Stogumber. That Domesday should have omitted Kelston is 
out of all question, it is reviewed in the Geld List, and was, I 
can hardly doubt, a part of “the 20 hides.” 
Witochesmeda I have placed in the Hundred of Wellow. Let 
us now deal with the difficulties of Table II in detail. We 
should expect the Estonas to lie near the Great Road on the — 

