286 
‘in which all his predecessors, tenants of the same 
manors, have enjoyed the same liberties from time 
immemorial. He claims the same on like ground in his 
manor of Northleyrton. 
The prosecution for the King urges that formerly, before 
J. de Vallibus and other itinerant Justices, one Adam de 
Everyngham, ancestor of the aforesaid Adam, whose 
heir he is,.was found to have in the said manor of 
Lesyngton “ weyf,” gallows, tumbrell, “thew and 
infangthef,” and free warren and thew at Northleirton 
only; & that the said Adam the ancestor said that 
concerning the said tumbrell, thew, weyf and free warren 
he claimed nothing in the said vills, nor did he claim 
any other liberties then except only gallows and 
infangthef in the aforesaid manor of Lesington, and 
this by title of prescription. 
Thejurysay . . . . thesaid Adam has been accustomed 
to punish those who offended against the assize of bread 
and ale by a money pain as often as they offended, as 
well the third time and subsequently as the first or 
second time, and did not inflict a corporal punishment 
onthem. . . . . Therefore the views of frankpledge 
in the three places are taken into the King’s hands. 
. . They are afterwards regranted to him by a 
fine &c. 
Northants, rot. 1.—Henry de Ferrers claims . . . . tumbrell 
at Newbottell, & says the manor of Newbottell to which 
the said liberties belong was formerly in the seisin of 
one Robert de Ferrers, who assigned it as dower to 
Margaret de Ferrers, his mother, & she enfeoffed 
William de Ferrers, the claimant’s grandfather, whose 
heir he is; and that Robert aforesaid and all his pre- 
decessors, tenants of the manor, have been seised of the 
liberties from time immemorial. 
The jury say the said liberties have been enjoyed as stated. 
Asked if he has a pillory and tumbrell there, they say 
no, and that he punishes offenders against the assize- 

