322 The Society’s MSS.—Chiseldon. 
Robert Walker for Badbury Farm 08. 17. 02. 
Henry Coster for all Mr. Calley’s 08. 10. 07. 
John Herring for Bailey’s Snod hill Ol. 02. 002. 
John Herring for Scoles’s O1. 03. 03. 
John Herring for Webb’s Snod hill 00. 07. 06. 
Thomas Smart for M™. Morse’s 04. 16. 03 
Thomas Smart for his own 03. 19. 04 
John Liddiard Esq’. for his Upper Farm 05. 00, 00 
Widow Skinner for M’. Liddiard’s Snod hill 05. 10. 00 
Thomas Herring for his own Ol. 08. 00 
Thomas Prince for M". Morse’s Snod hill 03. 05. 03 
Thomas Prince for Cresby’s Snod hill OL. O1. 04 
John Lovelock or his tenant 00. 12. 08 
Widow Cox & widow Skinner for Stamp’s 04, 11. 08 
Widow Cox for y* widow Baker's 00. 05. 02 
Robert Walker for his own 00. 05. O02. 
Robert Walker for y* widow Robins’s * 00. 05. 02 
Thomas Richens for M". Wake’s Ol. 11. 08 
. Thomas Richens for Cresby’s 00. 10. 01 
Thomas Richens for M'. Greenfield’s grounds 00. 18. 08 
Thomas Smart for one part of Cresby’s 00. 13. 04 
Anthony Allen for his own 03. 09. O1 
Thomas Smart for Charles Horton’s 00. 04. 00 
Ralph May for Harding’s meads 00. 14. 09 
Ralph May for Garner’s close 00. 02. 00 
John Savory for Dearham’s 00. 02. 00 
Anthony Tidcomb for Mt. Hardyman’s 02. 09. 00 
Stephen Miles 00. 06. 03. 
Thomas Dance 00. 06. 03. 
Charles Naish for Bailey’s Close 00. 02. 00 
79. 18. 00. 
Sum Total 179. 05. 00. 
Edward Carpenter ) Assesors & 
Henry Costar Collectors. 
Pleydell Goddard 
Go: Smith 
Ric: ffranklyn 
Wm. Calley 
The following brief memorandum represents the most vital, and 
the most beneficent, change in the village economy in the whole 
course of its written history. We have seen (No. 2) the conditions 
under which the vicar lived as concerned his glebe. Applied to 
the whole parish the same immemorial drawback to rational — 
cultivation was well-nigh intolerable. The inclosure awards 
