152 



under surfaces of apparently just the same shade ; no white 

 markings on face or back. Nose-leaf very short and broad, the 

 breadth of the upriiiht portion almost equal to its height ; 

 horizontal portion entirely bound down to and continuous with 

 the muzzle in front, on the sides notched in the position of the 

 extra lobes in bilobatu$, but without the lobes themselves, Kar 

 short, rounded, the notch behind the antitragus scarcely per- 

 ceptible, but a marked emargination in the outer edge of the ear 

 just above the tip of the tragus. 



Skull, when viewed from the side, lower in the muzzle and 

 more abruptly elevated above the orbits than in A. hilohatus. 



Dental formula as in A. planirostris and hilohatus, i.e. 



a' 1' 8' 3 ^ 2 = 32, this formula characterizing 



the subgenus Uroderma of Peters. Median upper incisora 

 broad, pointed in the centre of their cutting-edge. Canines 

 short and stout, their tips not projecting downwards beyond 

 those of the posterior premolars. Shapes and proportions of 

 molars very much as in A, hilohatus, except that the postero- 

 internal angle of H!ii projects inwardly some way beyond the 

 inner edge of ?^, while the two are about level in that species^ 

 Lower teeth also as in A. hilohatus, except that the posterior 

 premolar is as short horizontally as the anterior, and is therefore 

 decidedly shorter than £0- 



Dimensions of the type (a slightly immature* male in 

 spirit) : — 



Head and body 52 millim ; nose-leaf, height of lancet 5'5, 

 breadth of lancet 4"2, breadth uf horseshoe 55 ; height of ear 

 12'5 ; forearm 38 ; third metacarpal '35 ; tibia V6'6 ; foot 9'5. 



Skull : basal length 16'8 ; distance from front of canine to 

 back of E^ 70 ; breadth of palate outside 5LJ 8*2 ; vertical 

 length of upper canine 2'9. 



• The epiphyses of the limb-boDes are not fully oeified, but the teeth 

 are all up and in use. 



