SE agg ae 
a es 
Purton. A Case in the Star Chamber. 217 
“Ttem to the vjth Interrogatorie he seith that he hard sey that the said 
Sir Edmund bade the said Benet Joy feetch the said woode namyd in the 
seid Interrogatory and more he knoith not. 
“Ttem to the vijth Interrogatory he seithe that the said S* Edmund Bridges 
dyd cutt certen trees vpon the said farme and hath caryed them awey”’ 
“ Jonn Warez of Pyrton in the countye aforsaid husbondman of the age of 
Ixx or ther abought sworn and examenyd to the first Interrogatorie saith that 
he sawe an Indenture made to the said Richard Pulley Margarett hys wyfie 
Ambrose Edmund and Gylys of the premisses and more [he] knowith not. 
““Ttem to the second article he seith that he was present when John 
Frankleyn gaue the possession and seisen of the premisses to the said Richard 
Pulley and thothers before namyd which ys sence abought xxxvij or xxxviij 
yeres past. 
“‘Ttem to the iij** Interrogatory he seith whether the said Isabell was borne 
or had her byrth the day of possession taken or not he knoith not 
**Ttem to the iiijt artycle he knoith nothing. 
“‘Ttem to the vth artycle he seith that the said Sir Edmund Bridges ap- 
poynted Richard Calfey and Rychard Oteley to sowe the said xix acres to the 
thrid cock for thys yere vntyll hyt be tryed whether hyt were the said Sir 
Edmund Bridges or the said Benet Joys 
‘‘ Ttem to the vjt» artycle he sayth that he hard the said S' Edmund Bridges 
and the Woodward byd the said Benet Joy fetche the said woodd yf he wold. 
**Ttem to the vij artycle the said John Ware sayth that the said Sir Edmund 
Bridgis dyd fell certen trees wherof he hath not left in the said ground aboue 
the nombre of vj trees And that the said Benet Joy hath not taken to the 
value of a groote in hurte.” 
*Joun Carey of Puryton in the said countye husbondman of the age of 
lxxij or theraboughtes sworne and examenyd to the first and ij Interrogatorys 
he seith that the said Richard Pulley dyd occupie the premisses for xxxviij 
or xxxix yeres past by what state he knoith nothyng 
“‘Ttem to the iij** and iiijth Interrogatory he knoith nothyng. 
**Ttem to the vt® Interrogatory the said deponent saith that the said Sir 
Edmund Bridges bade hym and Richard Oteley stay the rent of the said xix 
acres vntyll the right be knowen bytwyne the said Sir Edmund and Joy 
And furder the said deponent saith that the said Richard Pulley held the said 
xix acres aboue xx yeres by what tytle he knoith not. 
“‘Ttem too the vjt artycle the said deponent saith that the said Bennet 
Joy might haue hadd the xx loodes of wodd yf the said Benet Joy wold haue 
taken such woodd as the said Sir Edmund wold haue assigned to hym. 
“Ttem to the vij artycle the said deponent knowith nothyng.” 
** Witt1Am Ropsyns of Puryton aforesaid husbondman of the age of lx 
yeres or therabought sworn and examenid to the ffirst artycle saith that he 
hard of a leasse made by the said abbott and covent of the premisez to the 
said Richard Pulley Margarett hys wyffe Ambrose Edmunde and Gylis and 
more he knoith_ not. 
P 2 
