By W. Jerome Harrison, F.G.S. 23 



Avebury, Lord. 1886. Stonehenge. Times, 19 Aug., p. 4. 

 " Archaeologists will be grateful to* Sir E. Antrobus if he will adopt the 

 suggestions of the Wiltshire Society." The Ancient Monuments Act 

 needs improvement, so as to give the nation " the option of purchase at a 

 fair price " of any monuments of national interest which are neglected or 

 in danger of being destroyed. 



Bacon, Rev. J. M. [h. 1846.] : Scientist, aeronmit, &c. 

 1900. Monumental Time-Keepers. Good Words [Dec] : 

 822—827; illustrated. 



Stonehenge is "by far the grandest annual sim-register in Europe," ai\.d 

 of "unknown antiquity." But to attempt to recover the date of its 

 erection by observation of the deviation of the present position of sunrise 

 on Midsummer day from that originally indicated by the Pointer Stone is 

 (Mr. Bacon thinks) hopeless ; for (1) the stones have certainly shifted (by 

 subsidence); and (2) the altar stone is no "mathematical centre" from 

 which to make the observation. 



Ball, Dr. V. [1843—1895] : Geol. Survey of India. 

 1881. Carrying and Eaising Large Blocks of Stone. 

 Economic Geology of India: p. 544; plate viii. [also note in 

 Part i., 1886 ; p. 125.] 



Barclay, Edgar : Painter. 1893. Stonehenge. Journ 

 Brit. Archceol. Assoc, XLIX., 179—205. 

 Practically an outline of the author's book on the same subject. 



1895. Stonehenge and its Earthworks: 4to., vii., 152 ; 



with forty-four illustrations : Loudon. 



Beautifully illustrated ; and altogether a most useful book. The monument 

 was " raised by British chieftains subject to Roman influence," during the 

 time of Agricola (79 A.D.). 

 See review in Wilts Mag., XXVIII., 269. 



1897. Stonehenge and its Earthworks : 4to., 11 pp. 



[Privately printed.] 

 A reply to some criticisms of the author's book upon Stonehenge. 



Barry, Rev. H. 1831. C.^^sar and the Britons : 8vo., 

 vi., 174: London. 



Avebury and Stonehenge (though perhaps separated from each other by 

 many centuries) both belong to pre-Druidical times (p. 39). 



