76 Bibliography of Stonehenge and Avehury. 



Eeane, A. H. [b. 1833] : Professor of Hindustani. 



1895. Ethnology; 8vo., XXX., 442: Cambridge. 



1896. Second Edition. 



Stonehenge was originally the work of Neolithic man. and was a menhir- 

 surrounded tumulus. Afterwards there came invaders (Kelts) from the 

 east, and these " may very well have adapted such cycloliths as Avebury 

 and Stonehenge to the solar cult." \_See chap, vi., pp. 123 — 140, Neolithic 

 and Metal Affes.] Compares Stonehenge and the great tumulus at New 

 Grange, in Ireland. 



Keate, Geo. [1729 — 1797]: Artist and anthor. 



Made drawings of Stonehenge in 1770. These were engraved by H. 

 Roberts for Easton, of Salisbury. 



Kell, Rev. E. 1865. Stonehenge. Ge7it's Mag., 486 — 488. 



Supports the theory that the monument was raised "to commemorate the 

 massacre of the British nobles by Hengist." 



Kelly, W. K. 1863. Curiosities of Indo-European Tradition 

 AND FOLK-LoRE : 8vo., xii., 308 : London. 



See Chap. II. — fire and the sun. " For the Germans at least the wheel 

 was an emblem of the sun." 



Kemble, J. M. [1807 — 1857]: Philologist and historian. 

 [Edited by]. A.D. 604 — 1060, c. Codex Diplomaticus ^vi 

 Saxonici. Six vols., 8vo. (c. 400 pp. each). Eng. Hist. Soc. 

 1839—1848. 



These Anglo-Saxon Charters or title-deeds are more than fifteen hundred 

 in number ; and frequently give minute particulars about the lands to 

 wliich they refer. See Vol. V , p. 237, for a charter (No. 1120) of Athelstan, 

 A.D. 939, believed by Mr. Kemble to contain references to Avebury. 



1848. Saxons in England; two vols., 8vo. : London. 



1876. New Edition ; two vols., 8vo. ; xii., 535 ; and iv., 562. 



Refers to Widukind's account (given in Leibnitz, Rer. Brunsw., I., 78 — 74) 

 of the massacre of the Thuringians by the Oldsaxons, as being the original 

 of the story of the treacherous attack upon the Britons by Hengist : 

 (Vol. I., p. 16, edition of 1876). 



1857. Notices of Heathen Interment in the Codex 



Diplomaticus [^vi Saxonici]. Archaol. Journ., xiv., 119 — 139. 

 In this Codex the boundaries of estates are defined with an "extraordinary 

 richness of detail." Mr. Kemble thinks that in Cod. Dip. 1120 there is 

 the " clearest possible allusion to the great stones at Avebury." He then 

 gives a translation of the document, which defines " the bounds of 



