By W. Jerome Harrison, F.G.S. 143 



Waring, J. B. 1874. Ceramic Art : fol., ii., 127 ; with 

 coloured title-page and fifty-five plates : London. 

 The object of this finely-illustrated book is to gather together, for com- 

 parison, examples of early pottery, etc. The Wiltshire " drinking-cups," 

 urns, " incense-cups," and paterae are figured. For Sun-Worship see 

 pp. 58—88. 



Warne, Chas. [1802—1887]: Archccologist. 

 1866. Celtic Tumuli of Dorset; fol., x., 76; illustrated: 

 London. 

 Eecords and figures the contents of one hundred barrows. 



1872. Ancient Dorset; fol., xxiii., 343 ; index, xv. pp. ; 



illustrated ; Bournemouth. 



Bockley Dyke " owes its rise to the alarm produced by Cassar's invasion of 

 Britain." The stone circles are described on pp. 113 — 124. 



Dr. T. W. Smart contributes a chapter entitled " Introduction to the 

 Primaeval Ethnology of Dorset " (pp. i. — xxiii.) 



Warner, Rev. Rich. [1763—1857]: Antiquary. 



1801. Excursion from Bath ; 8vo., 346 pp. : Bath. 



Abury was erected by the first invading body of Belgic Gauls ; and Stone- 

 henge by the second. They were rival temples, in fact. The greenstone 

 impost at Stonehenge was the cap of a small trilithon which " fronted the 

 entrance," forming a second gateway or portal to the more sacred parts 

 of the edifice. Stonehenge is described in pp. 172 — 184. 



Warton, Dr. Thos. [1728—1790] : Professor of Poetry, Oxford. 

 1775, c. Sonnet jSTo. IV., written at Stonehenge. 

 1795. Anderson's " British Poets," Vol. XI., p. 1075. 

 Editions of Warton's Poems, 1777 ; 1789, etc. 



1802. Edition by Mant: see Vol. IL, pp. 151—153. 



In these fourteen lines of admirable verse, "Warton contrives to enumerate 

 no fewer than five theories concerning Stonehenge. 



1782. History, etc., of Kiddington [Oxfordshire] 4to. : 



privately printed. 



1783. Second Edition, 4to., viii., 71 : London. 



1815. Thii'd Edition (re\dsed by Sir H. Ellis); 4to., viii., 82; 

 index, 8 pp., and one plate : London. 



Describes (p. 61) the Eollrigbt stones as having " every signature of 

 Celticism " and the author adds : — " I conceive [them] to be coeval and 

 perhaps of a class with Stonehenge. It seems to be either a British 



