410 Cadnam. 



of all the said nianerez londez and tenementez as yn the right of the said 

 Alice enfeoffed the said John Crykelade and Walter Sambourne in maner 

 and foiume as by y" saide bill is surmytted And after that the saide Thomas 

 and Alice died after whos dethe the right of the said nianerez londez and 

 tenementez discended to oon John Cryklade sonne and heire to the said 

 Robert Cryklade the which John Cryklade sonne and heire to Robert 

 Cryklade sued the said writte of sub pena in maner and fourme as is 

 supposed And after that y" said Crystian Walrand and Robert Walrand 

 and other as ys specified in the said bill enfeoffed the said John Cryklade 

 of the said manerez londez and tenementez specified in the said bill And after 

 that the said John Cryklade sonne and heire of Robert died without issue of 

 his body lawfully begoten After whos dethe the right of the said manerez 

 londez and tenementez discended to y' said John Cryklade as sone and heir 

 to the said Alice by force of the taille affore said Wherefor the said John 

 Cryklade semeth that the mater conteigned in the said bille of complaynte that 

 he ought noder in lawe nor set in conscience to be putte to aunswer And 

 alsoe he saith that y'" mater conteigned in the seid bille is remediable by y"^ 

 conien lawe with oute that that y" said Crystian "Walrand Robert and other 

 enfeoffed y' said Jolni Cryklade jointly with y" said Walter Sambourne in 

 maner and fourme as by y'' said bill is supposed And as for Walter Sambourne 

 he saith that he clameth nothyng yn y^ same manerez londez and tenementez 

 but utterly liisclamyth to haue any thing in y*^ same manerez londez and 

 tenementez All which materys and eueryche of theym the said John 

 Crj'klade and Walter Sambourne hare redy to proue as this courte will 

 theym award And prayen to be dismyssed oute of this courte with their 

 resonable damagez for their wrongfull vexacion &c. 



Early Chancery Proceedings, Bundle 44, no. 94. 



This is the replicacion of Edward Hungerford squyer to thanswer 

 of John Criklade and Walter Sambourn 

 The seid Edward saieth that the saide answer is insufl&cient to putte hym 

 to answer to Wherfor and in asmoch as the seid John Cryklade son of Thomas 

 and Walter Sambourne withsay not ther seid feoffment of the seid maners 

 by ther dede inroUid in this court of record made unto the seid John Criklade 

 son of Robert to haue and to hold to hym his lieirez and assignes for euer by 

 vertu of the seid sub pena And morover withsay not but that they confessed 

 in this court that they were at that tyme seased of the seid manerez in ther 

 demesne as of fee of the feoffement of the seid Thomas Crykelade and Alyce 

 And nought knewe nor any thyng hadde doon contrary or in avoydaunce of 

 ther seid feoffement made unto the foreseid John Crykelade son of Robert 

 And over that withsayn not but that long tyme after ther seid feoffment 

 made unto the seid John Cryklade son of Robert uppon a frendly communi- 

 cacion hadde betwene the same John Criklade son of Robert and them that 

 they by ther dede released unto the seid John Criklade son of Robert all the 

 right title and clayme that they hadde in the seid maners to haue and to 

 holde the seid maners to the seid John Criklade son of Robert his heires and 

 assignes for euermore with a clause of warantie of the seid John Criklade 

 son of Thomas as by the seid dede more playnly apperyth And also they 



