412 Cadnam. 



taill, And so enjoyed them and no thyng of theese manerez / And asketh 

 iugement if the seid John Criklatle sonne of Thomas contrary to his seid 

 o'the answer and mater of record shall nowe be resceyved to auoyde or hurt 

 the state of the seid Edward Hungerford of or in the seid manerez beforce 

 of the seid pretensed taill All which maters and all other maters allegged 

 by the seid Edward the same Edward is redy to auer and proue as this 

 court will award and prayeth as he hath don her before. 



Early Chancery Proceedings, Bundle 44, no. 95. 



This is the reiounder of John Crikelayd and Water Sambourne 

 to the replicacion of Edward Hungerford. 

 Therto they sayne that for so moche as the said Edward Hungerford with 

 saieth not the gyfte yn the tayll specified yn ther said aunswer the whiche 

 at altymes is redy to be shewed And that the said Cristian Walron and 

 odur was seased of the said maners londes and tenementes yn the lyffe of 

 the said John sonne to Robert of whos gyfte nor to whos vse it is not shewed 

 nor allegged by the byll of eomplaynte aunswer nor yet replicacion Wherfore 

 it is to hunderstond / that the said Cristiane and her cofeffes was seased to 

 ther owne vse and of true and lawfull estate and no nodur wyse to the 

 knowlege of the said John Crykelayd and Water Sambourne and it ys not to 

 be presumed that the said Cristiane and oilur hayd estate by the said John 

 Sonne to Thomas or to his vse butt yf it were so surmytted as it is not 

 surmytted and for so moche as the said Edward with saieth not that the 

 said feffement was mayde solle to the said John Cryklayd and not to the said 

 Water Sambourne by the said Cristiane and odur of the said manerz londes 

 and tenementes in the lyffe of the said John sonne to Robert and that the 

 said John is dede without issue of his body and the right of the said tayll 

 dissend to the said John Creklayd as cosyn and heir and the said feffement by 

 him mayde as in his said answer is surmytted in which cas the said John 

 Cryklayd is in his remitter be fors of the said tayll and at the tyme of the 

 odur writ of Subpena purchesed and specified in the said Replicacion the said 

 John Crykelayd haid no knowledge of his said tayll and at that tyme he was 

 nothyng entiteled to the same Wherfore he prayth accordyng as lawe and 

 conscience wyll require that he may haue and in joy the said londes and 

 tenementes accordyng to the said gyfte in the tayll and that he may be 

 dysinyssed howt of this court with his resonabyll costez for his wrongful! 

 vexacion. 



Harly Chancery Proceedings, Bundle 44, no. 96. 



Memorandum quod octauo die Februarij anno regni domini regis Edwardi 

 quarti post conquestum terciodecimo [8th Feb., 1473-4] per venerabilem in 

 Christo patrem Laurencium Dunolmensem Episcopum Cancellarium Anglie 

 iniunctum fuit Johanni Cryklade armigero quod nee ipse nee Robertus 

 Walron aut Cristina Walron nee aliquis alius nee aliqui alii de et in manerijs 

 de Cadenham et Stodeley cum suis pertinencijs in comitatu Wiltes aut in 

 aliquibus aliis terris et tenementis in Cadenham et Stodeley predictis ad 

 usum dicti Johannis Cryklade feoffati sub pena mille marcarum aliqua placita 

 acciones sectas querelas assissas attachiamenta processus sive execuciones 



