156 PROCEEDINGS COTTESWOLD CLUB 1903 
those already published. The lower portion of this record 
shows considerable detail; but here again, only one foot of 
deposit is stated to intervene between the Pseadomonotis- 
and Astheria-beds. The stratum which Jones and Lucy 
correctly considered the Pseadomonotis-bed is said to have 
yielded to the Rev. P. B. Brodie, Cyfrzs, plants, Cyclas, and 
fish-scales: these fossils, however, Brodie procured from 
his “ Cypres-bed.” 
In his paper “On the Zone of Avicula contorta and the 
Lower Lias of the South of England,” Dr Wright noticed 
the section, and having examined it in company with Jones 
and Lucy, gave a similar reading.* It is noteworthy, how- 
ever, that he records Pecten valoniensis from the Estherza- 
bed. Dr Wright’s record is transcribed into Prof. T. 
Rupert Jones’ “Monograph of the Fossil Zstherza,” 
published in 1862.* A still more detailed section was 
supplied for the same monograph by Mr Etheridge. In 
the latter section, 9 feet of deposit is shown to separate 
the Pseudomonotis- and Fstheria-beds.% : 
The same author contributed a valuable paper to the 
Proceedings of the Club,* giving a detailed palaonto- 
logical description: to this paper frequent reference is 
made later. 
The sections by Etheridge, published, the one in Prof. 
Jones’ Monograph, the other in the above-mentioned paper 
in the Club’s Proceedings, are reproduced in Dr Wright's 
communication “‘ On the Correlation of the Jurassic Rocks, 
in the Department of the Céte-d’Or, France, with the 
Oolitic formations in the Counties of Gloucester and 
Wilts, England.”» 
In 1871 Mr Etheridge reproduced the section given by 
himself in 1865, for comparison with that at Penarth, and 
r Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. xvi. (1860), pp. 378, 379- 
2 Palaeontographical Society (1862), p. 69. 
3 Lbid. p. 70. 4 Vol. iii. (1865), pp. 218-234. 
5 Proc. Cotteswold Club, Vol. v. (1869), pp. 151, 154. 
