a 
VOL. XV.(1) RHATIC ROCKS 43 
writer has employed the same numbers for what he 
considers the equivalent deposits. In his notes “On 
Two Sections of the Rhetic Rocks in Worcestershire,” * 
however, it was found undesirable to use the same 
sequence of numbers. The object of that communication 
was merely to record two sections, and as these presented 
an almost complete sequence, certain details of beds not 
therein visible were given on the evidence of the Dun- 
hampstead section. Therefore the aim of this note is 
to point out that, even if these three records be read 
in their proper order, they will not afford a generalized 
section of the maxzmum development of the Rhetic 
Series in Worcestershire, as the beds 5b and 6 are want- 
ing at Woodnorton. 
1 Geol. Mag., Dec. 4, Vol. x. (1903), p. 80. 
