90 PROCEEDINGS COTTESWOLD CLUB 1905 
a comparison of the figures given by Dr Davidson with 
Zeiten’s above mentioned leaves me with a considerable 
outstanding doubt as to the correctness of the identifica- 
tion. The fossil which is figured by Dr Davidson appears 
to be a form not uncommon in the upper portion of the 
Lower Limestone, immediately below the pisolite of 
Crickley, of which I have a considerable number. 
Whether my doubt is well founded or not, it is a plea- 
sure to be able to record the finding of two specimens in 
the Cotteswolds, which I venture to say admit of little or 
no doubt. Both specimens are from the lower portion of 
the Philiipsiana-Beds (Sauzei-Zone) of Cleeve Hill, agree- 
ing in respect of horizon with Dorset specimens as 
recorded by Mr S. S. Buckman.*. The Cleeve Hill fossils 
agree almost exactly with the nonplicate specimens figured 
by E. Deslongchamps, and also with the one figured by 
Quenstedt. 
A complete specimen measures in length 49 mm., in 
breadth 37 mm., and in thickness 26 mm. 
7. THECIDELLA GRANULOSUM, Voore. 
1854. Proc. Somerset Arch. and Nat. Hist. Soc., p. 117, 
pl. il., figs. 1—6. : 
1876. Day. Supp. Brit. Lias. and Trias. Brach., Vol. iv., 
pl. xii., figs. 1—6. 
8. ZELLANIA DAVIDSONI, JZoore. 
1854. Proc. Somerset Arch. and Nat. Hist. Soc., p. 112, 
pl. i., figs. 1—3 
. 
“ 
1876. Dav. Supp., pl. xi., figs. 18, 19. 
9. CRANIA SAUNDERSII, JZoore. 
1861. Geologist, Vol. iv., p. 98, pl. ii., figs. 11, 12. 
1876. Day. Supp., pl. ix., figs. 38, 39. 
1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. xlix. (1898), p. 498. 
