498 RYDBERG: NOTES ON ROSACEAE 
Jauisco: Leon Dequet. 
Oaxaca: 1894, Pringle 5871. 
GUERRERO: Chipancingo, 1903, Nelson 7068; between Chilapa 
and Texla, 1894, Nelson 2168. 
Cercocarpus fothergilloides HBK. To this species the follow- 
ing are to be referred. 
PUEBLA: Cerro de Paxtle, Purpus 4200. 
VERA Cruz: Orizaba, F. Mueller. 
Cercocarpus Traskiae Eastw. has not been collected outside of 
Santa Catalina Island, California. 
Cercocarpus mojadensis C. K. Schneider. To this belongs the 
following specimens: 
CoanuliLa: Sierra Mojada, 1892, M. E. Jones 134; Sierra de 
Plata, 1905, Purpus 1059; San Lorenzo Canyon, 1905, Palmer 537- 
Cercocarpus Pringlei (C. K. Schneider) Rydb. This was 
originally described as a variety of C. mojadensis, but I think it is 
specifically distinct. 
Cercocarpus macrurus Rydb. This is the C. parvifolius of the 
Klamath and Siskiyou region of California and Oregon. It is 
nearest related to C. montanus Raf., differing in the longer leaves 
with more numerous lateral veins and the large fruit. Although 
the characters separating it from C. montanus on one hand and C. 
Douglasii on the other are not so striking, it is geographically 
separated from both, the former being limited to the Rockies and 
the latter to central and southern California. The following 
specimens belong to it: 
CALIFORNIA: Siskiyou Mountains, 1880, Engelmann (fruit) ; 
same locality, 1866, Henderson (flowers); Ashland, 1866, Henderson 
259 (flowers and young fruit); Klamath River at Keno, Cusick 
2835; Klamathon, 1903, Copeland 3504; no locality, Wilkes Expe- 
dition 1167. 
OREGON: Weiner, 1898, Walpole 81; Barclay Springs, Modoc 
Point, Coville 1523 in part. 
Cercocarpus montanus Raf. There have been two species con- 
fused under the name of C. parvifolius Nutt. even from its first 
description in the Botany of Beechey’s Voyage by Hooker & Arnott. 
These authors adopted Nuttall’s manuscript name, but included 
in their description not only Nuttall’s type from the Rockies but 
