1886. | EK. T. Atkinson—WNotes on Indian Rhynchota. 205 
ly with a white powder similar to that on the wings: thorax beneath, 
femora and all the feet, red; anterior tibie and tarsi, black ; interme- 
diate pairs black outwards, reddish within, last pairs red with the tip 
and tarsi, black (Guérin). Long, body, 23: exp. teg. 75 millims. 
Reported from Sumatra, Java, Cochin-China. 
124. Hupuria cornuta, Fabricius. 
Lystra cornuta, Fabr., Syst. Rhyng. p. 57 (1803) ; Germar in Thon’s Arch. li, (2) 
p. 52 (1830) ; Guérin, Voy. Bél. Ind. Orient. p. 452 (1834). 
HE. (Callidepsa) cornuta, Stal, Hem. Fabr. ii, p. 87 (1868). 
S. Sordid sanguineous-flavescent : tegmina broadly sanguineous, 
sprinkled with numerous, here and there confluent, black spots, the very 
large disc behind the middle, black: wings and tibie sordid sangui- 
neous ; the tips of the tibie, tarsi, lateral margins of the thorax, and 
two lateral spots on the pectus, black: basal horn on the frons, erect, 
gradually acuminated, slender, somewhat larger than the vertex and 
thorax together (Stal). Body long, 22; exp. teg. 70 millims. 
Reported from China. 
125. PoLypIcTYA APHMNOIDES, Walker. 
Chalia aphenoides, Walker, Ins. Saund. Hom. p. 31 (1858). 
o. Ferruginous : abdomen black with red bands: tegmina with 
the apical third part paler: wings with whitish reticulations along the 
interior border and about the interior angle (Walker). Body long 123: 
teg. 37—38 millims. 
Reported from Penang. 
The present paper concludes this contribution to a ‘ Homoptera 
Indica ; for the families Psyllide, Coccide, Aphidide, Aleurodide, &e. 
have practically been unworked in India, and whoever takes them up will 
probably have to ignore much that has been written about them. My 
object has been to provide those who may become interested in this order 
of insects with some guide to the classification and arrangement, and was 
at first devoted to the correction of our only English list, but this be- 
came so unsatisfactory that it was found better to revise the whole on 
the basis of Stal’s numerous and elaborate essays. I have preferred 
where possible to give only the original descriptions, but where Stal, Sig- 
noret, Butler, or Distant have redescribed a species, their descriptions 
are recorded. It would have been desirable to give a new description of 
many species, but knowing the fruitful source of confusion which identi- 
