lIKXiaCOlIAU.NJA. 3S9 



to the proiiotum are less ])i-oiioauced than iu either of the two 

 preceding species. 



Length, $ , 14 ; breadth between prouotal angles 4 millim. 



Bah. 8ikhim {Atl-inson, Brit. Max.). 



C. Lateral j^>roni>tal aiu/les sahpromhient^ not S2>iuous. 



l'-j'2S. Henricohahnia inermis, Bist. (Foiestus) A. M. N. H. (7) xi, 

 p. 2o3 (1903). 



Pale brownish-ochraceous, sparsely gre3ashly pilose ; connexivum 

 spotted with luteons, lueuibrane cupreous ; third joint of antenna) 

 (excluding apex) and base of fonrth joint luteous. Pronotum with 

 two discal somewhat indistinct carinae, much more distinct on 

 anterior lobe, where there are altogether five carina?, none on pos- 

 terior lobe near lateral angles, ^\■llich are only subprominent and 

 not spinous ; con]iexivum produced, but not angulated ; legs 

 unarmed, excepting the anterior femora, which have a series of 

 spines beneath. 



Length 13 ; breadth between pronotal angles 3 nnllini. 



Ilab. Sikhun (Coll. Disf.); ^h\ng])h.a (AfJ.-insDii, Brit. Mas.). 



1329. Henricohahnia gallus, sp. n. 



Pnscous or brownish-ochraceous, head, anterior lobe of pronotum, 

 and legs a little darker ; antenna? unicolorous ; rostrum luteous, 

 its apex and base of second joint beneath black ; body above finely 

 ])ilose, lateral margins of head and pronotum, the antenna? and legs 

 longly pilose, two central carinas occupying disks of both lobes, the 

 lateral angles iiot or subprominent, the lateral margins and anterior 

 lobe sparingly spinulose ; connexivum slightly produced and 

 distinctly angulated, somewhat minutely spotted with ochraceous 

 near the incisures ; membrane bronzy ; femora coarsely granulate 

 and spinulose and with the anterior tibia? spined beneath. 



Length 9^ millim. 



Ilab. Nilgiri Hills ; Kotagiri (i?i-i^. J/»s. ). 



Subfamily XIL NABIDIN^. 



This subfamily is easily distinguished from the other similar 

 divisions of the Keduviidaa by having the rostrum four-jointed, 

 the basal joint being short and usually stout. Some writers have 

 followed the great authority of 8tal in regarding the group as 

 constituting a distinct family, but the general opinion of those 

 who have studied the Order is that the Xabidina? can only be 

 treated as a subfamily of Keduviidoe. This subfamily is almost 

 universally represented, although comprising only a limited number 

 of genera and species. 



2d2 



