49 



lar shapes, such as are shown in the illustration (Plate 111), having 

 somewhat the semblance of a gall, which name has been rather generally 

 applied to them b}- florists. After the formation of the "gall," what 

 is known as wet rot is apt to set in and destro}^ the leaves. This 

 has the ultimate efiect of dwarfing the plants and of arresting the 

 development of the flower buds. 



From the frequency with which maggots resembling those found on 

 the leaves of violets are found in the soil in violet houses, it has been 

 thought that the insects live both in the soil and upon the leaves. It 

 has been thought, also, that this pest is more apt to make its appearance 

 in greenhouses where proper attention has not been paid to the mixing 

 of the soil and to drainage, and that manures of some kinds favor its 

 development. It seems probable, however, in the light of more tech- 

 nical knowledge of the subject that the larvas found in soil are in nearly 

 every case those of Mycetophilid», and probably of diflferent species of 

 Sciara, several forms of which occur in greenhouses, of which some are 

 reported to be injurious while some are scavengers. One of these spe- 

 cies known as the fickle midge will be treated farther on in the present 

 publication. 



LITERATURE OF THE SPECIES. 



What appears to be the first account that can be with positiveness 

 attributed to this species of "gall fl}-'' was published in the Florists' 

 Exchange (Dec. 1!>, 1896, p. 1132), by Mr. Dorsett. At that time it 

 was not known that this species was difl^'erent from the so-called gall 

 flies of roses. The account in question is a short one, and is illustrated 

 by a half-tone reproduction of a photograph showing injury to violet 

 leaves l)y the hirvie. In the same publication (issue of December 3, 

 1898), Mr. W. Davison wrote of the occurrence of this species at 

 Nj^ack, N. Y., and in The American Florist for Jainiary 21, 1899, Dr. 

 L. O. Howard gave a brief summary of what was then known concern- 

 ing the insect. In Mr. Gallowaj^'s " Commercial Violet Culture," pub- 

 lished the same year, this species is considered on pages 211-21-1-, inju- 

 ries by tlie larva; to the flowers of violet being illustrated. 



The aim of the present article is to present in concise, summarized 

 form most of the facts which have already been made public in the 

 articles above quoted. 



REMEDIES. 



Hydrocyanic acid gas does not appear to have been tested against 

 the violet gall fl}^ or if it has })een used we have no published account 

 of the fact. There is no reason to believe that it woidd ])e less efl'ective 

 than when employed against aphides and other insects. Its use is, 

 therefore, suggested. It does not seem practical to pick the leaves, 

 because in such cases the crowns ai*e permanently injured and flower- 

 ing is checked. Mr. Galloway suggests the use of air-slaked lime, 

 3253— No. 27—01 4 



