58 MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF INSECTS. 



few of his species of Cicindela. This is a family of very great extent, 

 2250 species having been described by Dejean, which are contained 

 in his own collection, and their are numbers which he does not possess. 

 It is a family which has attracted much of the attention of modern 

 entomologists, Clairville, Bonelli, PaykuU, Dejean, Leach, Latreille,&c., 

 being amongst those whose investigations have been directed to its 

 elucidation ; hence, the structure of the perfect insects has in a great 

 degree become well known : few observations have, however, been 

 made relative to the natural history of the various species. 



This family is at once distinguished from the Tiger-beetles by the 

 maxillae terminating in a simple point without any articulation at 



Gory, in ditto. (Monograph on Pamborns.) 



Lequien, in ditto. (Monograph on Antliia. ) 



Westwood, in ditto. (Memoir on the Genus Ozaina and its allies.) 



Erichson. Kafer der Mark Brandenburg. 



Cadolini. Eniimeratio Carabicorum Ticinensium. 8vo. 1830. 



Mannerheim. Monographia Pelophilarum in Ilumniell's Essais Entom. part iii. ; 



and Descriptions of new Species of Carabida? in ditto, pp. 4, 5, 6. 

 Eschscholtz, Zoologischer Atlas, fasc. 2. 

 Griffith. Animal Kingdom. Part, Insects. 

 Fischer. Entomographie de la Russie. 4to. 



Kirhy, in Linn. Trans, v. 12. (Century), and v. 14. (Pscudomorphaand Catascopus. ) 

 Zimmerman, Monographia Amaroidum. Berlin. Svo. — Ditto, Monographie der 



Carabiden, 1st Stuck. Berlin, 1831. Svo. — Ditto, Monograpli on Amara in 



Gistl's Faunus, 1st band, 1st heft. Munchen. 1832. 

 Germar. Coleopt. Nov. Spec. 

 Hoppe, in Nov. Act. Acad. Curios, vol. xii. 

 Knock. Neue Beitrage. (On Cychrus. ) 

 Adams. Mem. Soc. Nat. Moscow, vol. v. 



Waterhouse. Monograph on Nothiophilus, Entomol. Magazine, vol. i. 

 SchiUing, on Holocnemis (Pteroloma Gi/U.) in Beitrage zur Entomologie, 1st heft. 

 Erichson, on the same genus in Weigman's Arch, (in which the genus is regarded 



as belonging to the Necrophaga). 

 Hope, in Synopsis Ins. Nepaul (Gray's Zool. Misc. i.) — Ditto, in Zool. Soc. 



Trans, vol. i. — Ditto, in Trans. Ent. Soc. vol. i. pi. 1. 

 Bahington, in Trans. Ent. Soc. vol. i, (On Dromius. ) 

 Solier, in Ann. Soc. Ent. de France. 1834. — Ditto, Ditomus, Aptinus, &c. — 



Ditto, 1837, various genera. — Ditto, 1835, various new species. 

 Kollar, in Annal. der Weiner Mus. der Naturgesch. b. i. 1837. (G. Damaster, 



near Cychrus ; G. Panaga;us. ) 

 Sehiodte. Memoir on Danish Amar.i^ in Kroger's Naturhist. Tidsskrift. 

 And the Works of Linv(Pus, Fdhricius, Gyllenhall, OUvier,Stephens, Curtis, Marshnm, &,-c. 



