ADDENDA AND CORRIGENDA. 
p. 41. 9. Engraulis dussumtiert C.V. In the synonymy of this 
species it has been forgotten to quote: Exgraulis Dussumieri 
Bleeker, Atl. Ichth. vi. 1866—1872, p. 133. 
p. 42. In the last line: “8 being ventral” must be read: “8 being 
postventral”’. 
p. 76. 8. Clupea (Harengula) stereolepis (Ogilby). In a paper 
(Records Australian Museum, ix. n°. 3, 1913, p. 355), which 
we received by the kindness of the author, when the first 
part of this volume was already printed, Mc Culloch says 
on p. 356: “I have compared one of the types of Haren- 
gula stereolepis, Ogilby, with a co-type of H/. kunzez, Bleeker, 
and consider that they are the same species. I have failed, 
however, to find the palatine teeth mentioned by both 
Bleeker and Day, and they are wanting in Bleeker’s co- 
type. The Torres Strait fish as a whole are more slender 
than the figures of S. kunzez, but they vary considerably, 
and some are quite as deep as the typical form. The 
position of the ventrals is also variable, being sometimes 
before the middle of the dorsal, and sometimes behind 
that point. The accompanying figure represents a Murray 
Island specimen”. 
As we have united Harengula kunzei Blkr. with Clupea 
(Harengula) moluccensis Blkr., Clupea (Harengula) stereo- 
lepis (Ogilby) ought to be brought under the synonymy 
of Clupea (Harengula) moluccensis Blkr., if the interpre- 
tation of Mc Culloch is right. 
In the second line from bottom for stereolepsis read: 
stereolepis. 
p. 81. Clupea (Harengula) moluccensis (Blkr.), add to the 
synonymy: 
Sardinella lineolata Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. nat. 
Poissons xx. 1847, p. 272. 
Clupea (Harengula) dubia Bleeker, Atl. Ichth. vi. livr. 
Q 
25, Go 20, 1O72, py. 10d; 
aa 
