EUPHYIA. Hv L. B. Pkoit. i'SI 



E. subangulata Koll. (= extraneata Gttcn., cyraaria Biitl.. nee (!iien.) (Vol. 4. pl. 10 b). White, the t'ore- auhaiujuktUi. 

 wing witli ied-l)iu\vii median band, bright orange-brown inner band and siibteiniinal shades. tlic latter strongly 

 developed beneath. Except in the \\idth of the median band not particularly variable. — ab. melidiata Fdd. is melidialu. 

 a somewhat extreme $ form, the type from Lahul: rather large, median band broadencd. hindwing above ratlier 

 dark as far as the postmedian, conspienously white beyond. — sitbangulala inhaViit.'^ X. W. India and Af'ghani.stan : 

 it was described from Masuri. — antigonia J^roiil (': uh. Inc.. ? sp. dir.) (Suppl.-Vol. 4. pl. IS]). Likewise mod- antUjon'M. 

 erately broad-banded, even in the ,^, but distinguished by its more angular markings. Underside with the orange- 

 brown outer liand generally less developed, at least posteriorly, than in the latter. but not so nearly siij)pressed 

 as in the former. Kashmir, espeeially at Gulmarg, the t.ype locality. 



E. goniodes l'roiit (-7 1). Intermediate between siihanyiilfiUi and mcdioritluria. with nearh- the tone of »'>"'<"/<■.<. 

 the latter, but with the postmedian angled. approaching that oi suhangiiluta. Fore- and midleg slightly darker 

 than in ■mediovittaria, forewing very slightly more produced, hindwing rather straighter-margined between the 

 costal and the 2nd radial; ochreous tints less pronounced. Chumbi Valley (loc. typ.) and Yatong, Sikkim- 

 Tibet; also Kashmir. 



E. mediovittaria Moorv (27 1). Recognizable by the almost str;ugh1 jiostmedian line of the forewing. wcdiovitUi- 

 Hindwing above \\hitish, very feebly marked. Sikkim. — &lon&r'\a.()l)< rlh. (Vol. 4, pl. 9 b) apparentl>- represents 

 i/iedioriffaria in W. China. It differs very little excejjt that the hin<l\ving is less whitish and less weakly marked. 



na. 

 Lonarid. 



E. cinnamifusa sp. n. (27 1) at tirst sight reealls rather large and dark. broad-banded nuhuiiijnliiln but cinnamijusa. 

 the differences are numerous and obvious. Antenna of the o shortly ciliated (nearly V2) instead of simjjle. Fore- 

 wing with the area between basal and median bands more heavily lined, the brown intermediate band fairly 

 broad, but neither bright nor elean-cut; antemedian line curved; very characteristic orange-cinnamon siiifiisions 

 developed about the oell-dot and on a great part of the subterniinal area. espeeially as two broad longitudinal 

 patches about the folds: central projection of postmedian obtuse. Underside less Ijrightly coloiired than in 

 subangulata. more like that of Xanihorhoe ra.slanfri. Kashmir: (Julmarg, 10 — 30 June 1931 and (1 ,j. not very 

 fresh) on 20 July (T. B. Fletcher). 3 ,^,3 and 5 '^ v in the British Museum. 



E. torpidaria Lierh (Vol. 4, pl. 7 i). Founded on a o fi'fnii Mu-pin. not obviously related to any known lorpidaria. 

 Euphyia. possibly an Enh phria. Paljjus rather long, antenna finely ciliated; anal tuft strong; wings strongly 

 glossy, 2nd radial of hindwing not arising cjuite so far fttrward as in most Euphi/ia. 



E. unangulaia Haw. (Vol. 4. pl. lob) chinensis Sferneck. "Basal area of forewing concolorous with chinoisis. 

 median band, black-brown, the distal boundary of the l)and between 3rd radial and Ist median not produced 

 to a Sharp point but only bluntly bowed. Distal area entirely dark-grey. the waved subterminal line therein 

 narrowly white. The inner edge of the disal area sharply defined", parallel with the postniedian. J^asal area 

 of hindwing as far as the postmedian unicolorous dark-grey. Differs from lucfuosaria Oberth. (Su]jj)1.-\'()1. 4. 

 pl. 15 c) in the smaller, more rounded jjrotuberance of the postmedian, the more sinuous inner edge of the distal 

 area, the dark basal area of the hindwing and the lack of the white spot in the distal area of the foiewing 

 beneath. Ta-tsien-lu, 3 S.2- Unknowai to nie. 



E. coangulata Pivul (== subangulata Stgr.. nee KoII.) (see Vol. 4. ]>. 247) is said to be longer-winged coanguinta. 

 than unangulaia, the dark parts more brownish, the outward projection of the median band moic strongly 

 produced, the distal area less darkened. Mongolia. Mentioned here because Sterneck ])rovisionally refers to 

 it a pair from Sunpanting, W. China, which are very similar to picata Hb». (Vol. 4, pl. 10 b) exce])t that the 

 postmedian is not dentate as in that species and espeeially in its Chinese leprescntative ochreatn. liut almost 

 smooth, excepting the single, strong central projection. 



E. ochreata Moorp (Suppl.-Vol. 4, pl. 1.') h). Apparently a very rare species. only known from the odircaUi. 

 Darjiling Originals. As its affinities are evidently with the genotypieal Palaearctic group. we have figured in 

 that fauna the ? paratype kindly lent by the Berlin Museum. Hindwing and underside darker than any other 

 of the group. Large (33 to over 35 mm); ])roximal area of forewing rather indistinctly marked excepting some 

 costal maculation, basal patch incompletc; median and distal areas much as in picata, but with the jjostmedian 

 more jagged and the white subterminal spots larger and rounder. not at all lunulate. — brunneimixta Th.-Mieg brunnei- 

 (= picata Leech. nee Hbn.) (Suppl.-Vol. 4, pl. 15 c) may be a smaller and less dark race of uchrxita. but I am 

 inclined to expect that anatomical research will show it a distinct species. In any case distinct from both picata 

 and submarginata. notably in the .shape of the ■■costal arm" in the j genitalia. In the wing markings sei)arable 

 from jncata by the more strongly dentate i)ostmedian and paler. weakly marked stdibasal ai'ea and lundwing. 

 Thierry-Mieg's differentiation W the denser and brown (not green) wavy markings which traverse the 

 white area of the forewing and their tendency to consoUdatc into a rather strong brown suffusion about the 



