122 MUSEUM METEORITES—HONEYMAN. 
Olivine and iron are the obvious constituents of our own 
specimen. 
Analysis of these meteorites : 
9 
Olivine sp. gr. 3.3 
Si Oi ota tie sey sienna eee eer 36.92 
Ke -O:4n Gehan sO eee a eee 172k 
Mins Optica Laas oa ee ie eee eee 1.89 
Mics See iain chs ard AM ar act Nee Ol eee eee 43 90 
IRON 
HGS Lieb satardeahh WW iartee REMC wie ee ccnep eee eee 88.01 
INS arate: erat eat eh as ace ere ke a an ee eee 10.25 
IB te a ae ET Ee Acmientoto eke He 0.33 
Ip yeni dotee Ge ie hate, is wee this He yh abe irl at 0.21 
| Ch a eee erin nahin bec beter eu eats Wa cd ci 0.15 
Buchner Die Meteoriten Giessen, 1859. 
Mr. Kuntz, in another memoir, “ On the meteorites of Glorietta 
Mountain, Santa Fe Co., New Mexico,” observes: “This iron is 
of the ‘ Holosiderites’ of Daubreé, and comes under the general 
croup of ‘Caillite’ of Stanislaus Meunier (type meteorite of 
Caille, Var). It is related to the iron of Augusta County, Vir- 
einia; Whitfield, Georgia, and Washington County, Wisconsin. 
It is of characteristic octohedral structure, and the Widman- 
steettian figures are made of kamacite, i. e., iron with a little 
nickel enveloped in taenite, i. e, iron rich in nickel and _plessite. 
Olivine was observed at the upper end of fragment No. 1. The 
meteorite had been broken into seven fragments.” <A plate of 
this from an electrotype of the etched surface shows the char- 
acteristic Widmanstttian figures in great beauty. 
In another: “On the Waldron Ridge, Tennessee, Meteorite,” 
he observes: “This iron is of the Caillite group of Meunier. 
Schreibersite is a constituent, also T’vroilite, as well as graphite, 
clearly suggesting that the iron is identical with that of the 
Greenbrier County mass in the British Museum,” This has 
already been referred to, 
: 
