200 GEOLOGICAL RECREATION.—HONEYMAN, 
of the drift elevation. While the drift of Ware and the railway 
may be regarded as the product of glacial action, its present 
appearance reminds of the accumulations of the Annapolis Valley 
and the Boar’s Back of Cumberland, which we regard as glacial 
drift redistributed by the action of melting ice and disastrous 
floods. I searched in vain for glaciation on the exposed-rock 
outcrops. 
Still further comparison will be interesting. The rocks of 
Princeton and Rocky Hill, with the boulders of the. Ware drift, 
while exhibiting differences, show at the same time sufficient 
points of resemblance as to establish a relationship between the 
Massachusetts Archean and. our own, as occurring at Arisaig 
and the Cobequid Mountain. In the latter especially where 
we have syenitic gneisses associated with granitic rocks. Vide 
my Papers on the Geology of the I. ©. R. and the Cobequids. 
Trans. Vol. III, pp. 345-393. 
The garnetiferous schists of Barre Plains and New Braintree 
have their undoubted equivalents in the Labrador rocks, as we 
know from the frequent occurrence of garnets and garnetiferous 
schists brought to our Museum by fishermen and others who have 
occasion to visit Labrador. 
The only rocks with which I can compare them in Nova 
Scotia are associated with rocks of a later aye in the County 
of Yarmouth. I have pointed out interesting micaceous schists 
at George’s Lake and Chegoggin Point. Vide Geology of 
Digby and Yarmouth Counties. Trans., Vol. V., pp. 236-243. 
From their association with the Lower Cambrian rocks of our 
gold fields. I was led to refer them to a corresp-nding age. It 
is, however, possible that their proper associates are the granites 
rather than the quartzites and argillites. With Dana and others 
I am disposed to refer these also to the Archzean ,Period. This 
would bring the garnetiferous schists of Massachusetts Centre 
and the like schists of Yarmouth into close relationship. In paper 
“ Geological Notes,” Trans., Vol. V., 335. These garnetiferous and 
auriferous schists as compared with the Medicine Bow Range, 
are regarded by Arnold Hague as having a “strong resemblance” 
to “characteristic beds of the Huronian (Archzean) formation, 
