IQT3. | S. Kemp: Crustacea Stomatopoda of the Indo-Pacific Region. 61 
1880. Squilla nepa, Miers, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), V, pp- 25, 458, pl. ii, fig. 13 (partim). 
1893. Squilla nepa, Henderson, Trans. Linn. Soc. Zool. (2), V, p. 452 (partim). 
1893. Squilla nepa, Bigelow, John Hopkins Univ. Circ., No. 106, p. 102. 
1894. Squilla nepa, Bigelow, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus , XVII, p. 535, fig. 21. 
1908. Squilla hemischista, Wood-Mason, MS., Lloyd, Rec. Ind. Mus., II, p. 32 (sine desc.). 
Squilla nepa was only clearly distinguished from S. ovatoria in 1893. The precise 
identity of the specimens recorded in the following papers is uncertain :— 
1796. Cancer (mantis) digitalis, Herbst, Krabben u. Krebse, II, p. 92, pl. xxxiii, fig. I. 
1837. Squilla nepa, H. Milne-Edwards, Hist. Nat. Crust., II, p. 522. 
1839. Squilla nepa, Randall, Journ. Acad. Sci. Philadelphia (x), VIII, p. 147. 
1847. Squilla nepa, White, Hist. Crust. Brit. Mus., p. 83. 
1859. Squilla nepa, Nicolet, in Gay’s Hist. fisica de Chile, Zool. III, p. 224. 
1865. Squilla nepa, Heller, Reise ‘Novara’ Exped., Crust., p. 124. 
1876. Squilla nepa, Miers, Cat. Crust. N. Zealand, p. 89. 
1882. Squilla nepa, Haswell, Cat. Australian Crust., p. 208. 
1886. Squilla nepa, Filhol, Miss. de Vile Campbell, III, 2e, p. 435. 
1887. Squilla nepa, Walker, Journ. Linn. Soc., XX, p. 113. 
1892. Squilla nepa, de Man, in Weber’s Zool. Ergebn. Nied. Ost.-Ind., II, p. 518. 
1892. Squilla nepa, Thallwitz, Abhandl. Kon. Mus. Dresden, No. 3, p. 55- 
1901. Squilla nepa, Lanchester,' Proc. Zool. Soc., p. 553: 
1906. Squilla nepa, Lanchester,’ Fascic. Malayenses, Zool., III, p. 133. 
In the following papers reference is probably made to the true S. nepa, but there 
is a possibility of confusion with S. holoschista :— 
1898. Squilla nepa, de Man, Zool. Jahrb. Syst., X, p. 693. 
1899. Squilla nepa, Nobili, Ann. Mus. Civ. Genova (2), XX, p. 275. 
1900. Squilla nepa, Nobili, Ann. Mus. Civ. Genova (2), XX, p. 519. 
tgor. Squilla nepa, I,enz, Zool. Jahrb. Syst., XIV, p. 477. 
1903. Squilla nepa, Nobili, Boll. Mus. Torino, XVIII, No. 452, p. 23, and No. 455, p. 38. 
1906. Squilla nepa, Tattersall, Ceylon Pearl Oyster Rep., V, p. 166. 
1908. Squilla nepa, Stebbing, Ann. S. African Mus., VI, p. 44. 
1910. Squilla nepa, Lenz, in Voeltzkow’s Reise in Ost-Afrika, II, p. 571. 
The dorsal surface of the carapace and abdomen is finely rugose ; especially so on 
the median area of the latter. The carapace measured behind the antero-lateral angles 
is rather less than half its length, including the rostrum. The median carina of the 
carapace (fig. 49) is sharp and distinct throughout its course. It is bifurcated in front 
for half, or rather more than half, its length anterior to the cervical groove, and the small 
median dorsal pit is enclosed in the base of the fork. Behind the cervical groove it is 
bifurcated for the greater part of its length and projects as a prominent tubercle in 
the middle of the posterior margin. The intermediate and lateral carinae are distinct. 
The spines at the antero-lateral angles are very strong and project far beyond the level 
of the rostral articulation ; the postero-lateral angles are rounded. 
The rostrum is a little broader than long and its upturned lateral margins are rather 
strongly convergent. Dorsally it sometimes bears an obscure median tubercle and 
this, in one very large specimen, forms an obsolete median carina. 
! Lanchester does not seem to have been aware of Bigelow’s important paper of 1894. 
