120 



analogous to the lungs of the other Vertebrata. He špoke of the num- 

 ber of the Ccccal appendages as greater in Lepisosteus than in any 

 other fish ■which he had dissected ; and referring to certain fossil bo- 

 dies by \vhich geologists have long been puzzled, and ■which have 

 been regarded as fossil wonns, he stated his opinion, from the olose 

 resemblance between the two, that they are in reality the caecal ap- 

 pendages of the fossil fishes, in whose company they are generally 

 found. 



Mr. Gray exhibited young shells of Argonautą Argo and Arg. hi- 

 ans, with the view of caUing the attention of the Society to a new 

 argument in favour of the opinion that the animal {Ocythoe) found 

 in the shells of this genus is parasitic. This argument is founded on 

 the size of ■what Mr. Gray has termed the nucleus of the shell, viz. 

 that original portion of it -n-hich covered the animal mthin the 

 egg, and which is usually found to differ in surface and appearance 

 from the remainder of the shell formed after its exc]usion from the 

 egg. In the specimens exhibited Mr. Gray described the nucleus as 

 blunt, rounded, thin, slightly and irregularly concentrically wrinkled, 

 and destitute of the radiating waves •tt'hich are common to the adult 

 shells of all the species of this genus. These waves he stated to 

 commence immediately below the thin hemispherical tips, and he 

 therefore entertained no doubt that those tips constituted the nucleus 

 of the shell, and covered the embryo of the animal at the period of 

 its exclusion from the egg. Judging from the size of this portion of 

 the shell, ■which in one of the specimens measured nearly one third 

 of an inch in diameter, and •vvas consequently many times larger than 

 the largest eggs of the Ocytho'ė found •vvithin the Argonaut shells, 

 Mr. Gray inferred that it mušt have been produced by an animal 

 "vvhose eggs are of much greater magnitude. The Ocythot cannot 

 therefore, he conceived, be the constructor of the shell, and its true 

 artificer still remains to be discovered. Mr. Gray further remarked, 

 ■with reference to Poli's statement that he had observed the rudiment 

 of a shell on the back of the embryo of Ocythoe examined by him, 

 that he has himself uniformly found, in all the eggs of Mollusca which 

 he has examined, the shell ■well developed, even before the develop- 

 ment of the various organs of the embryo. With respect to the ar- 

 gument derived from the want of muscular attachment, he observed 

 that the animal of Carinaria (to ■vvhich he considered it probable that 

 that of Argonautą is most nearly related), although firmly attached 

 to the shell while living, separates from it ■vpith the greatest ease 

 ■when preserved in spirits, being from its gelatinous nature very rea- 

 dily dissolved. . These cireumstances, he conceived, might fairly ac- 

 count for the animal of Carinaria having been, until very recently, 

 unknown, and for that of Argonautą still remaining undiscovered. 



