Reed : The mildews of the cereals 



373 



TABLE XXII. — Results with Tridcum pohmicufn L. 



^ fl 









«5 



a 





trola 



Results 





u S 









« ,^ 



rt ii 



a 







v E 



Date 



Source of conidia 



■ 



4, — ■ 









u 













Numb 

 experi 



Date 



Inoc. 

 plants 



Controls 





1908 









1908 







71a 



leb. 



10 Triluum diioccum 



9 



2 



I 



Feb. 17 



-r + + 





59c 



i< 



I Iritictim duyum 



1 



8 



3 



2 



'* 10 



■ P ¥ 



+ + - 



_ 



73c 



a 



10 



Tridcitm polonu um 



9 



I 



I - 17 



+ + + 





S7a 



a 



I 



IriHcufu Spelt a 



8 



3 



I 



" 10 -f-4- + 





Sra 



Jan. 



24 



Tridcitm vu/gare 



10 



3 



2 



Jan. 30 +^-+ 





S^c 



(C 



24 





10 



3 



2 



'* 30 



+ + + 







53b 



<i 



24 



U <( 



10 



3 



I 



" 30 + + + 





62c 



Feb. 



3 



<< it 



10 



2 







Feb. 10 -t--|- + 



» • 



75b 



M 



10 



it a 



9 



I 







" 17 



+ + + 



% • 



92a 



<< 



22 



a tt 



9 



3 



3 



" 29 



+ + + 





1 68c 



Nov. 



20 



cc « 



6 



3 



4 



Nov. 26 



+++ 





169c 





20 



■ 



6 



3 



2 ** 26 



+ + + 









ta: 



BLE XXIII. Resul 



TS WITH Triticitm Speita L.^ 





. a 







1 

 1 



« 



to 



= 15 







u 



Results 







Date 



Source of conidia 





u 



c 

 







^.5 









^5 



1 



1 



1 





] 

 i 





. 

 fl 







# 







! 



Date 



1 



Inoc. 

 plants 



Controls 





190S 









1908 



1 

 1 





72c 



Feb. 



10 Tridctim die oc cum 



9 



2 



2 Feb. 17 



+++ 



1 



S9a 



i( 



I 



I'ritiLiDii durnui 



8 



4 



6 



" 10 



+++ 



1 



83b 



if 



21 



t< (< 



8 



3 



3 



" 29 



+++ 





84b 



<< 



21 



* 



8 



4 



4 



'« 29 



+++ 





61C 



<< 



I 



Tridcum poloniciim 



8 



2 



4 



" 10 



+++ 





74b 



«( 



10 



(< (< 



9 



3 



I 



" 17 



+++ 



— 



56c 



<< 



t 



Triticuni Spelt a 



8 



4 



7 



•* 10 



+++ 





. 69b 



<< 



lO 



<< (( 



9 



3 



-> 

 



.. 17 



+++ 





49c 



Jan. 



24 



Triticitm vulgare 



10 



3 



2 Jan. 30 



+++ 





54c 



t( 



24 



(( <i 



10 



3 



3 " 30 



+++ 





S5b 



<< 



24 



(i (< 



10 



3 



3 " 30 



+++ 





89a 



Feb. 



22 



<c <e 



9 



6 



3 Feb. 29 



+++ 





I02C 



May 



16 



<< << 



10 



4^ 



3 



May 24 + + + 





103b 



<< 



16 



<c << 



10 



2' 



2 



" 24 + + + 





HOC 



July 



7 



<( (< 



4 



3 



2 



July 14 



+++ 





I34<^ 



Oct. 



21 



<( it 



8 



6 



3 



Oct. 30 



+++ 





139c 



<^ 



31 



(C <( 



7 



3 



5 



Nov. 7 



+++ 



— 



142a 



ii 



3' 



<< <( 



7 



5 



5 



.. 7 



+++ 





^ Triticitm sativuNi Speita Hackel. 

 2 Two leaves of each plant inoculated, 



mildew. The other case is with reference to Triticum nioftococcum, 

 which Marchal claims gave negative results. As already stated, 

 forty-seven out of fifty-seven leaves Inoculated became infected in 



the tests which I made. 



It is evident from this review that the mildew on each of the 



