RvDBERG : Notes on Rosaceae 405 



H. 



H. fenella {H.fitsca tenella S. Wats.). A reexamination of the type 

 of the latter proved it to belong to a species which the writer 

 thought undescnbed. H. tenuisecta is therefore the same as //". 

 tenella, in greater part, of the writer's monograph. To it belong 

 the following specimens : 



Washington: Falcon Valley, July 28, 1882, Snksdorf 24^2 

 (type), and \%g6,6o; Ice Cave, Trout Lake, Aug. 5, 1894,/! 

 E, Lloyd, 



To the true //. te)iella belong the following : 



California: San Joaquin River, Fresno Co., 1891, Coville 

 & Fiinston i8j6 ; Hogg Ranch, Yosemite National Park, 1902, 

 Hall & Babcock jjy8 ; Morgan, Tehama Co., 1903. /jp^/ Can- 

 nell Meadows, Tulare Co., 1904, 51 17. 



Horkelia hispidtda is related to H. sericata but lacks the silvery 

 pubescence characteristic of that species. In habit it resembles 

 H. Michenei'i also and may easily be mistaken for it, if the floral 

 characters are overlooked, the sepals and bractlets being very dif- 

 ferent. H. Jnspidida is known only from the type locality. 



H. Brozvnii is related to //. tenella and H. parvijlora. It differs 

 from the former in the dense pubescence and from the latter in the 

 deeply divided leaflets and the open inflorescence. To it is to be 

 referred the following specimen, besides the type : 



California: Mt. Shasta, 1892, E, Palmer 2448 a. 



//, integrifolia is related to H. tridentata but differs in the entire 

 leaflets and the appressed pubescence of the stem and thepetioles.. 

 It is known only from the type locality. 



77. pidchra is related to H, 



ir 



instead of about 9 and they are deeply cleft into lanceolate divi- 

 sions. Tt also is known only from the type station. 



One change of name was necessary. H. bernardina Rydb^ 

 was substituted for H. Parryi Rydb., there being an older H. 

 Parryi Greene, H. Parryi Rydb. was based on H. Bolanderi. 

 Parryi S. Wats. It may be that Dr. Greene had the latter in mind,, 

 when he proposed the new species, but there is no evidence that 

 he did, for he cited no synonym, nor in any other way referred to 

 Watson's variety. The types of both 77, Bolanderi Parryi S. 

 Wats, and H. Parryi Greene were collected by Parry in southern 

 California, but at different localities and in different years. 



