the DiUenian Herbarium. HI 



Of No. 8. there are several specimens, only one of which is in 

 fruit: this is the same plant as is preserved in most English Her- 

 baria under the name of I., cakar&s, but is very different from 

 that so called by Wek and Hoffman, though, perhaps, not speci- 

 fically distinct from L. amtigms, Hoffm. The specimens not in 

 fruit appear to belong to L. varians, Duties. 



15. A. Here, with several specimens of L. ater, are preserved 

 one of L. subfuscus and one of L.parasemus. B. is L. scruposus, 



as is already well known. 



16. This number, besides L. subfuscus, comprehends a specimen 

 marked " sine limbo," which is L.ferrugineus, Huds. and another 

 marked " e muro," which is L. epipolius, Achar. 



34. and 35., made by Lightfoot varieties of L. tremelloidesy 

 appear to belong with more propriety to Z. sinuatus. 

 Of 40. 41. 47. 48. and 58. there are no specimens. 

 60. (L.fucokks, Dicks.) seems evidently only a small variety of 

 the following, No.6l., {L.fuciformis, Dicks.) of which there are four 

 specimens : three of these exhibit an appearance quite unknown 

 to, or at least unnoticed by, modern botanists, being copiously 

 furnished at their margins with small, round, sessile, concave 

 shields, black in the centre, with a thin elevated white margin. 



62. A. appears to be a narrow variety of L. scopulorum, FLDan. ; 

 B. is L. scopulorum, with its common appearance ; C. L.fastigi- 

 atus, Achat: It is to this number Linnaeus has referred for his 

 L. cnlicaris. 



Of 64. 65. 66. 61. and 68. there are no specimens. 

 71. L. pulverukntus of Schreber. A single specimen, among 

 many others, without any letter subjoined to it, has black shields, 

 and appears a distinct species, the same as No. 7'2., which Hud- 

 son joined with No. 71., referring both to the (3. of L. steilaris. 

 Dr. Acharius has far more properly separated them. 



73. L. affinis. 



