114 Mr. Turner's Remarks upon 



32. H prolixum, Dicks, seems to differ from the preceding num- 

 ber (H. riparioides, Heche.) only in having grown in a situation 

 where it was drawn by the current to a greater length. 



37. Dillenius appears to have mixed under this number speci- 

 mens of H. latescens and nitens ; the former, " e Monte Wedden- 

 berg" the latter " epratis uliginosis circa Gissam." 



39. Can hardly be any thing more than a small variety of 

 H. squarrosum. 



52. H. nutrale, Dicks. — I could discover no difference between 

 this and H. confertum, Dicks. 



64. This number has been uniformly quoted as H. serpens, Linn. 

 and the figure appears to have been taken from that species; but 

 I am much mistaken if all the specimens do not belong to Leskea 

 subtilis, liedw. 



Of 72. and 73. there are no specimens. 



BRYUM. 



No. 4. Hudson has referred this number to Splachnum vasculo- 

 sum, Linn, and Mr. Dickson to his S. ovatum; but the specimens 

 agree with his S. gracile. 



16. A. and B. are Dicranum scoparium ; C. Dicranum poly set urn. 

 Swartz.; and D. a species not yet described, which is to appear 

 in the Flora Britannica under the name of Dicranum majus. 



27. Of this number, B. C. D. E. are Trichostomitm canescens ; 

 A. F. G. Triehostomum heterostichum. 



41. Bryum polyphyllum, Dicks. ; widely different from Fissidens 

 polycarpos, Hedw. with which Hedwig and Hoffman have united it. 



Having now concluded my remarks upon the Dillcnian Herba- 

 rium, I must further trespass on the indulgence of the Linnean 

 Society, by observing that, when I began these observations, the 



idea 



