218 Mr. Bnowi!^, on the ProteacecB of Jussiett. 



There is no means of determining the genus of this plant, but 

 it is rather more probably a Leucadendron than belonging 

 to any other. 



Leucadendron ? ? 



Conocarpodendron ; acaulon ; folio rigido, nervoso, oblongo, 

 latiori ; cono fusco ; semine oblongo, in medi6 quasi exca- 

 vato. Boerh. Liigd. Bat. 2. p. 201. c. tab. 



I know not what to make of this. If the strobiUis and nuces 

 at the bottom of the plate really belong to it, it must be re- 

 ferred to Leucadendron, and will stand near L. retusum or 

 L. plumosiirn ; but there are some circumstances both in the 

 figure and description which render this very doubtful. 

 Thunberg refers it to his P. strobilina, but the description3 

 by no means agree.. 



Leucadendkon ? 



Scolymocephalus Oleae folio. Shcrard. in Raj. Hist. 3. Dendr, 



p. 10, 

 This, according to Boerhaave, is his Conocarpodendron, &c. 



2. p. 197. c. tab. which I have considered as the female of 



Leucadendron squarrosum. 



Leucadendron ? ? 



Protea glabra. Thiinb. Diss. 71.. 52. 



Prom the very short and unsatisfactory description of Thun- 

 berg, the genus of this plant cannot be determined, or even 

 with much probability guessed at. 



IsOPOGON. 



Protea divaricata. And. Repos. 465. 



Can this be a variety of Isopogon anemonifoUus ? The yellow 



flowers 



