CUAP. CIII. SALICA CEA. SA‘LIX. 1485 
stances of the leaves, the number of stamens, and whether the plants are trees, 
shrubs, or creepers. With due deference to the opinion thus expressed by 
the great father of scientific botany, we think that the study of willows, or of 
any other species of plant, in its native habitat is by no means a good mode 
for determining what are species, and what are varieties ; but rather likely, 
on account of the great difference of habitats, to increase the number of both ; 
since every difference may be considered specific relatively to the circumstances 
which produce that difference. It appears to-us that it would be a better 
mode to collect plants of the particular genus to be studied from all the dif- 
ferent habitats in which they are to be found, and to cultivate and study them 
in the same garden, where they would be all subjected to the same exterior 
influences. What Sir J. E. Smith says on this subject does not appear to us 
much more satisfactory than the advice of Linnzus. ‘ Willows,” he says, 
“ should be particularly studied at three different seasons: the flowering time; 
the early part of summer, when the young shoots, with their stipules and ex- 
panding foliage, are to be observed ; and, finally, when the leaves are come to 
their full size. No botanist, therefore, can be competent to form an opinion 
about them, unless he resides among the wild ones, for several seasons, or 
continually observes them in a garden. No hasty traveller over a country, 
no collector of dried specimens, or compiler of descriptions, can judge of their 
characters or esseutial differences. One principle, above all, in this depart- 
ment of botany, and indeed in every other, cannot be too strictly enforced. 
We should study a species before we decide on its characters, and not lay 
down rules of definition beforehand. In many plants, the differences of 
simple or compound, entire, serrated, or jagged, leaves ; the presence or absence 
of stipules; though usually so essential and decisive, make no specific dis- 
tinction at all. In some tribes or genera, one part affords the best specific 
character, in others some different part. The distinctions of willows are fre- 
quently so very nice, that the greatest observation and experience only can 
stamp them with due authority.” (Eng. F., iv. p.165.) After thirty years’ 
study of every kind of willow that could be procured in any part of Britain, 
in the garden of Mr. Crowe, where seedlings innumerable sprang up all over 
the ground, Sir J. E, Smith was not only confirmed in the immutability of 
his species, amounting to 64, as natives of Britain, but also, that new or 
hybrid species were not produced by the seeds of species growing together in 
the same garden. Both these conclusions are alike at variance with those of 
most other botanists. As the result of this eminent botanist’s study of the 
genus, he has arrayed his 64 species of British willows under three sections, 
characterised by the margins and surfaces of the leaves; viz. 1. serrated and 
smooth ; 2. entire and smooth ; and, 3. surface shaggy, woolly, or silky. Since 
the time of Sir J. E. Smith, the principal British student of willows is Mr. 
Borrer ; and, in Sir W. J. Hooker’s British Flora, this able botanist has ar- 
ranged the British willows, increased in Sir W. J. Hooker’s work to 71 
species, under 18 sections. These sections are all natural; and each is 
characterised by the name of a typical species. This is obviously a very great 
improvement in the arrangement of this genus, whether these kinds are con- 
sidered as chiefly species, or chiefly varieties; and to us it appears the best 
adapted for the present state of our knowledge of willows, till all the known 
kinds shall have been studied for a number of years in one garden. 
Among the Continenta! botanists, the late Dr. Host of Vienna, and Pro- 
fessor Koch of Erlangen, appear to be the principal students of willows. 
Dr. Host, in the preface to ES Salix, seems disposed to consider the kinds of 
willow that exhibit the same appearances when under the same circumstances 
of soil and situation as distinct species; and he has described no fewer than 
60 of these as natives of Austria. He admits the extreme difficulty of de- 
termining what are species in many cases, from the different localities in which 
the same species is sometimes found. For example, willows which inhabit 
low moist situations in valleys flower only in the spring; while those which 
inhabit mountains do not flower till after the melting of the snow, which sel- 
