114 NILS HJ. ODHNER, MOLLUSCA. 
Fig. 84. The same, from aperture. X 2.6. 
» 85. The same, from below. X 2.6. 
86. Macrochlamys suturalis un. sp., from above. Malanda, Queensland. 1.5. 
87. The same specimen, from aperture. X 1.5. 
» 88. The same specimen, from below. X 1.5. 
>» 89. #lammulina cumulus n. sp., from above. Bellenden Ker, Queensland. % 3.3. 
90. The same specimen from aperture. X 3.3. 
» 91. The same specimen from below. X 3.3. 
» 92. Endodonta intermedia n. sp., from aperture. Cedar Creek, Queensland. & 8. 
» 93. The same specimen from below. X 8. 
» 94. Chloritis bilabiata n. sp., from above. Malanda, Queensland. X 2.5. 
» 95. The same specimen from aperture. X 2.5. 
» 96. The same specimen from below. X 2.5. 
97. Thersites castanea n. sp., from aperture. Queensland. Nat. size. 
» 98. The same specimen from below. 
» 99. Atopos (Prisma) australis? Heynemany, from below. Herberton, Queensland. 1.6. 
- 100. The same specimen from above. X 1.5. 
» 101. Planispira praehadra n. sp., from above. Chillagoe, Queensland. Nat. size. 
» 102. The same specimen from aperture, 
» 103. The same specimen from below. 
, 104. Microcystis antiqua n. sp., from above. Chillagoe, Queensland. X 3. 
» 105. The same from aperture. X 3. 
» 106. The same from below. X 3. 
» 107. Hypselostoma australis n. sp., from above. Chillagoe, Queensland. 10. 
» 108. The same, another specimen, from aperture. 10. 
» 109. The same, another specimen, from below. X 10. 
> 110. Aphanoconia extincta n. sp., from above. Chillagoe, Queensland. X 3: 
» 111. The same specimen from aperture. X 3. 
112. The same specimen from below. X 3. 
» 113. Omphalotropis minuta n. sp., from aperture. Chillagoe, Queensland. % 10. 
» 114. The same specimen from below. X 10. 
» 115. Microphyura microdiscus Bavay, from above. Chillagoe, Queensland. X 10. 
» 116. The same, another specimen from aperture. * 10. 
» 117. The same a third specimen; outer wall broken in order to show the parietal teeth. > 10. 
» 118. The same, a specimen from below. 10. 
Postscript. 
While the last sheets of this publication were going through the press, I received a letter from Mr. 
Cu. Heprey in reply to my question, as to whether Microphyura microdiscus from Chillagoe, of which I had sent 
a specimen for comparison, was identical with Jf, hemiclausa of Tare. Mr. Hepiey informs me that the iden- 
tity of these forms has already been established by Funron (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 8, XIV, Aug. 1914, p. 164, 
and Proc. Malac. Soc. XI, 1915, p. 236), who has also erected the genus Stenopylis for the reception of the 
species, which, consequently, should be named Stenopylis hemiclausa (Tare). 
