MOLLUSCA OF INDIA. 25 
Synoptical List (continued). 
Character. Name. Locality. 
JUINELACE ...0eee0ees 8. Jaintia Hills. 
; NAGAENSIS . 02+ 0ee0000s Naga Hills. 
c. Base tumid below.......-..++++++. grata ae Ditto. 
LOTIGCNSUS. ..ceesenees Khasi Hills. 
B. Shell globosely conoid ; sides 
convex; aperture small, subper- 
forate ; close fine transverse cos- 
tulation. OMG maces seitaaieets N.W. Himalaya. 
TESINUWID ..-.0--000e- Khasi Hills. 
d. Rounded on last whorl ......... 4 sikkimensis........+. BK. Himalaya. 
OTE sognoncaGoo8e0e N.W. Himalaya. 
UOLCRUT, Cae aeteeeteeieateel= Munipur. 
: Thotaensts ...000++- Lhota-Naga Hills. 
e’, Subangulate on periphery «+  gnimuda ....ccsvere: Khasi Hills. 
Genus SITALA. 
Sitala, H. Adams, P. Z.S. April 1865, p. 408. . 
In a paper entitled “ List of the Land Shells collected by Mr. 
Wallace in the Malay Archipelago, with Descriptions of the new 
Species by Mr. Henry Adams,” under Trochomorpha tropidophora, 
Ad. & Reeve, from Borneo, is the following note :— 
“From the observations of Mr. W. T. Blanford, the animal of 
T. lychnia is without a mucous pore at the extremity of the foot ; 
and Trochomorpha therefore must be removed from the family 
Stenopide. The species infula, Bens., however, hitherto included 
in Trochomorpha, is, according to Mr. Blanford, furnished with one, 
and must remain in that family, where it may be considered the 
type of a group, under the name of Sitala.”—/. Ad. 
The genus was therefore, under this title, never thoroughly de- 
scribed ; but it is sufficiently well indicated, and it was very neces- 
sary to remove infula from the subgenus Trochomorpha, in which 
Albers had originally placed it. 
Ferd. Stoliczka, in ignorance of the very brief note by Adams*, 
described this genus most thoroughly and accurately under the name 
of Conulema, in that very elaborate and excellent paper on “ Terres- 
trial Mollusca from the Neighbourhood of Moulmein,” in the Journ. 
Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 1871, p. 236, taking attegia, Bs., for his type, 
and including culmen, Blf., infula, cacuminifera, are, and pal- 
maria, Benson, H. gratulator and confinis, Blf., liricincta, Stol., pro- 
pably WV. apicata and H. hyphasma, Pfr., from South India and 
Ceylon, H. leucophlea, Martens, from Celebes, and a few others. 
Stolicaka says also, “ The genus is, as regards form and structure of 
the shell, closely allied to Semper’s Martensia (a name already em- 
ployed in botany) (Reisen im Archipel der Phil. &c., Theil 2, Band iv. 
p- 42); but in this the light shell-lobe of the mantle is said to be 
* And he acknowledges this when describing St¢ala carinifera, in J. A. S. B. 
1873, p. 16, saying Conulema must now be regarded as identical with Sitala. 
