82 Berry: FLorRa OF THE MATAWAN FORMATION 
It may be compared with our flate 5, fig. 2, which represents 
a branching stem similar in size and outline; the latter is silicified 
and retains remains of the attached leaves, rendering it reasonably 
certain that it is a portion of a stem of Cunmnghamites. 
Although comparisons are impossible because of the destruction 
of the type specimen, Dr. Hollick suggests that his Strodclites in- 
guirendus from this formation may represent a distorted section of 
a stem like the one here figured. 
Passaic, N, J. 
Explanation of plates 
PLATE I 
Fics. 1, 2. Andromeda Parlatorit Heer. 
I 
Fic. 4. Tricalycites papyraceus Nev 
Fic. 5. Protopryllocladus subinteg a (Lesq.) Berry. 
Fic. 6. Sassafras acutilobum Les 
Fic. 7. Magnolia tenuifolia pie 
Fic, 10. Laurus proteaefolia Lei sq. 
Fic. 11, Dammara arlene ges Hollick. 
Fic. 12. Pinus delicatulus sp. no 
PLATE 2. eae one tenth) 
Cones of Sequoia gracillima (Lesq.) N 
PLATE 3 
Fic, 1. Laurus plutonia Heer. 
; a Hee 
Fics. 7-9, 11. Cu RTOS Nesp (Corda) Endl. 
Fic. 10. Magnolia speciosa Hee 
PLATE 4 
Fic it. lyrica Cliffwoodensis sp. nov. 
Fics. 2, 3. einitzia formosa Heer. 
FIG. 4. — angustifolia Newb. 
Fic. 5. L£ucalyptus Geinitei Heer. 
Fic. 6. Gleichenia iii Die Heer. 
Fic. 7. Gymnos' e. 
Fic. 8. Sequoia Reichenbachi (Gein.) Hee 
Fics. 9, 10. Frenelo, opsts Hoheneggert (Ett. ) Schenk. 
IG. I 
Fic. 13. Viburnum ae sp, nov. 
E 5. (Reduced one tenth) 
Fics. 1, 5. ee aI stems. 
Fics. 2, 3. Stems of Cunninghamites. 
Fic. 4. Unknown organism. 
