CODE OF BOTANICAL NOMENCLATURE 255 
353 (1884), is based on several specimens, of which the one collected by 
Palmer in Arizona is the type; Cuscuta Cephalanthi Engelm. Am, Jour 
Sci. 43: 336 (1842), is based on specimens from several hosts, of bic 
the one from Cephalanthus is the type 
(6) Among specimens equally eligible, the type is that first 
figured with the original description, or in default of a 
figure the first mentioned. 
EXAMPLES.—Calyptridium roseum S, Wats. Bot. King’s Exp. 44. 
Pl.6, f. 6-8 (1871), is based on at least three specimens, of which ihe one 
figured is the type ; Arn vifolia Hook. Fl. Bor, Am. 1 : 331 (1833), 
is based on two specimens, neither of which is figured, and the one first 
mentioned, which was collected by Drummond in alpine woods of the 
ocky Mountains, is the type. 
(c) In default of an original specimen, that represented by the 
identifiable figure or (in default of a figure) description 
first cited or subsequently published, serves as the type. 
XAMPLES.— Trillium sessile I. Sp. Pl. 340, is based on three cita- 
tions, of which the second is the pide sii! nape by a figure ; 
Centaurea Scabiosa L. Sp. Pl. 913, i mber of citations, of 
which the first mentioned is the ict as no ‘aun are cited. 
Canon 15. The nomenclatorial type of a genus or subgenus is 
the species originally named or designated by the author of the 
name. If no species was designated, the type is the first bi- 
nomial species in order eligible under the following provisions : 
(2) The type is to be selected from a subgenus, section or 
other list of Assen originally designated as typical. 
Exa —Psilogramme Kuhn, Festschr. 50-Jahr. Jub. Kénigs. 
Gace zu ais. 5 332 (1882), is typified by the first mentioned species 
of the second section Zupstlogramme, and not from species ee in the 
first section Jamesonia, which is ae n a generic name previously pub- 
lished; Phania DC. Prodr. 5: 114 ( RN is typified by P. ere 
DC., the only species of ree ain Eupha 
(6) A figured species is to be selected ea than an unfig- 
ured species in the same work ; or, in the absence of a 
figure, preference is to be given to a species accompanied 
by the citation of a figure. 
EXAMPLES.—Lespedeza Michx. Fl. Bor, Am. 2: 70 (1803), is typi- 
typified by Randia tetracantha (Cav.) DC., the second species cited, 
as this had been figured by Cavanilles, whereas Randia Humboldtiana 
DC., the species first mentioned by Hooker, had not been figured. 
