104 



impressed liefore apical area; pronotum with a transverse impres 

 sion near each eye; face latei'ally rather strongly angulate. 



Long. incl. tegni. 7 mill. 



Hab. : Queensland (F. P. Dold. — Brit. Mus.). 



Burymeloides zonatus sp. n. — Vertex and pronotum 

 ochraceous, wrinkled and mottled with castaneous ; vertex with 

 two central piceous spots separated by a pale line ; pronotum with 

 sorae irregular and obscure darker markings, the more prominent 

 ofwhich is a longitudinal piceous line before and behind each eye; 

 scutellum black, latéral margins — excluding base and apex nar- 

 rowly ochraceous; head beneath and face piceous mottled with 

 ochraceous, cheeks pale castaneous with pale ochraceous margins 

 and reticulate markings ; sternum piceous ; abdomen beneath and 

 legs ochraceous ; tibiœ darker with small pale spots ; tegmina 

 piceous brown, crossed by two pale transverse greyish fasciœ, the 

 first before middle, the second before apical area, both fascise nar- 

 rowing interiorly, the dark space between the pale fasciœ and the 

 dark apical area more or less irrorated with small pale greyish 

 spots and three spots of the same colour onclaval suture ; scutellum 

 coarsely punctate on basai area, profoundly transversely impressed 

 before apical area. 



Long. incl. tegm. 6 mill. 



Hab. : N. S. Wales (Brit. Mus.) 



Genus EURYMELA. 



Eurymela Lep. et. Sew. E>u\ MétJt., X. p. 603 (1825) ; Sign , Aii)i. 



Soc. Ent. Fr., (2) LX, p. 502 (1850). 

 Eurymelops Kirk., Rep. Exp. Stat. Haiv. Plant. Assoc, Pt. IX, p. 



354 (1906). 



KiRKALDY bas proposed a new name for the Division A. of 

 SiGNORET, (Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr., (2) IX, p. 503, not p. 497 as written 

 by Kirkaldy). 



Eurymela distincta. 



Eurymela distincta Sign., Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr., (2) IX, p. 506 (1850) ; 



Stâl, Ôfv Vet.-Ak. Fôrlt. 1862, p. 495. 

 Eurymela spéculum Walk., Lisl Hom., III, p. 641 (1851), 

 Eurymela luhra Kirk., Rep. Exp. Stat. IJaw. riant. Assoc, Pt IX. 



p. 356 (1906). 



Kirkaldy writes of his proposed E. lubra : « AUied to E. distincta 

 from which it apparently differs principally by the red ab- 

 domen, etc. » This is the normal character of the pecies. Signoret 

 certainlv desci'ibes Id couloir unifoDU'^ h\\\ tlien be is as certainly 



