New York Agricultural Experiment Station. 503 



As to the last question, in most cases the answers were not 

 suflBciently definite to enable us to give dates of other outbreaks. 



In conclusion it may be said that the outbreak of the army 

 worm in 1896 was one of the most serious and extended which 

 was ever known in this country. Probably the most serious in- 

 jury was done in the eastern and central states. 



Partial Bibliographical List.* 



* An asterisk denotes that the item was taken from the "BibHography of the More Import- 

 ant Contributions to American Economic Entomology," by Samuel Heushaw, published by 

 the U. 8. Dept. Agr., Div. of Entomology. 



1835. *Bradshaw, Joseph. The army worm. Farmers' Re- 

 porter. Farmers' Register (Va.), 1835. 



Accwmt of Leucania iinipuncta in Ohio in 1825 and 1835. 



1837. *PoRTER, J. R. The army worm. Cultivator, September, 

 1837, vol. IV, No. 7, pp. 116-117. 



Ravages of Leucania unipuncta. 



1810. *Hendekson, Stephen. The army worm. Farmers' Reg- 

 ister [Va.], 1840, pp. 660-661. 



Ravjij^es of Aletia xi/llna in Louisiann in 1840. 



1842. *Wait, William S. The army worm. Missouri Reporter, 

 1842. 



History ami habits of Leucania unipuncta; preventives. 



*Bradshaw, Joseph. The army worm. Union Agric, 



1842, vol. II, p. 4. 

 History, babits and raean-i ai^ainst Leucania unipuncta. 



1847. *Morris, M. H. The army worm. Amer. Agric, Febru- 

 ary, 1847, vol. VI, p. 50. See: Ibid, July, 1847, vol. VI, 

 p. 209. 

 Habits and metamorphoses of Leucania unipuncta. 



1849. *Allen, a. B. & R. L. Ravages of the army worm. Amer. 

 Agric, August, 1849, vol. VIII, p. 261. 



Destruetiveness of Leucania unipanila in son! hern Illinois :ind in 

 Missouri. 



38 



