THICK-SKINNED BEASTS. 47 



3. Ehinoceros nasalis, Gray, Cat. Carniv. <&c. p. 305, f. 34, 35 



(skuU) ; P. Z. S. 1867, p. 1012, figs. 1 & 2. (skuU). 



723 b. Skull ; nearly adult ; wanting the intermaxillaries and the inner 

 cutting-teeth, with very large lateral cutting-teeth. 

 " E. sondaicus, Cuv. Java," dealer. 

 Borneo ? 



723 c. Skull ; nearly adult. 



R. nasahs, Gray, I. c. p. 305, f. 34 — 35 (skull). 

 Borneo. Wright. 59, 8, 16, 1. 



4. Rhinoceros stenocephalus, Gray,1Cat. Carniv. dc. p. 310, fig. 



38—39 (skuU) ; P. Z. S. 1867, p. 1018, f. 5, 6 (skull). 



722 e. Skull ; half-grown. 



Rhinoceros stenocephalus. Gray, Cat. Carniv. dc. f. 38, 39. 

 Asia. Zool. Soc. 



5W< Tivo-horned Asiatic Bhinocerotes. 



Nose horns two, one behind the other. The lower cutting-teeth two, 

 lateral. No intermediate ones in adult. Skin smooth. 



2. CERATORHINUS, Gray, Cat. Carniv. dc. p. 313. 



1. Ceratorhinus sumatranus, Gray, Cat. Carniv. dc. p. 313. 



R. lasiotes, Sclater, P. Z. S. 1872, p. 494, pi. xxiii. 



Ehinoceros de Sumatra, Cuv. Oss. Foss. ii. 27, t. iv. 



R. sumatrensis, Blain. Osteog. 



Sumatran rhinoceros. Bell, Phil. Trans. 1793, p. 3, t. ii., iii., iv. 



(copied Cuv. Oss. Foss. iii. p. 42, t. 78, f. 8). 

 R. sumatranus, Blainv. Osteog. t. (skull). Blytli, Jouryi. Asiatic 



Soc. of Bengal, xxid. 1862, -p. 151, t. 3 (skull). Midler, Ve^'hand, 



t. XXXV. (animal). 



1461 a. Skull ; adult. 

 Pegu. Theobald. 



1461 b. Skull ; nearly adult. 

 Sumatra. Rafdes. Zool. Soc. 



1461 c. " Hinder horn 13 in." Blyth. 

 Sumatra ? (89 f.) 



The figure of the skull, like the figure of the animal, attached to Mr. 

 Bell's paper in the ' Philosophical Transactions ' (vol. Ixxviii. 1793, p. 3, 

 t. ii. — iv.) well represents this species, and has well-developed cutting- 

 teeth in the lower jaw, and the space between the condyles of the skull 

 narrow, which is the character of this s^Decies. 



Home's figure of the skeleton of the Sumatran rhinoceros (Phil. 

 Trans. 1821, t. xxii.), from the skeleton now in the Royal College of 

 Surgeons, better represents the height of the skull, but scarcely suflS.- 

 ciently shows the distinction between the two species. 



The figure of B. sumatrensis, 2 , Blainv. Osteog. t. h., is not so high 

 behind as the skulls of either of the species, and in other respects is 

 not characteristic. 



